I inserted the info on a word table. For some reason Wakefield got lost somewhere in transit. Spooky eh? Wonder if its an omen??GeoffN posted:
You appear to have relegated Wakefield already....
Search found 74 matches
- Mon Sep 11, 2006 6:55 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: 2nd half table
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1619
Re: 2nd half table
- Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:19 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: 2nd half table
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1619
Re: 2nd half table
<r>Well done boys, spotted the deliberate mistake.....(NOT)!?!??<br/> The point of the post though was to show how form has changed so dramatically 2nd half.<br/> Interesting the point that you make though, as you say (and Phil Clarke) maybe our disaster early on may have done us a tremendous favour...
- Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:59 am
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: 2nd half table
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1619
2nd half table
<r>Interesting reading. If only we started the season at round 15 this year!!<br/> <br/> pld w d l pts<br/> <br/> Hull 12 11 0 1 22<br/> <br/> Wigan 12 9 0 3 18<br/> <br/> St H 12 9 0 3 18<br/> <br/> Leeds 12 8 0 4 16<br/> <br/> Brad 12 6 1 5 13<br/> <br/> Harl 12 5 0 7 10<br/> <br/> Cass 12 4 1 7 9...
- Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:51 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: What is 111points difference
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1401
Re: What is 111points diff...
<r><QUOTE><s>[quote]</s><B><s>[b]</s>wgnwrs posted:<e>[/b]</e></B><br/> Everyone was anticipating a cricket score when we played hudersfield 3 weeks ago and look how that performance and result ended up. <e>[/quote]</e></QUOTE> I think we need dry conditions so anything is possible, because we are n...
- Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:26 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: Ref for Sunday:
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2347
Re: Ref for Sunday:
Have we ever won a game with him officiating? I THINK NOT!
- Sun Sep 03, 2006 9:10 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: Bye Bye Wakey
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2911
Re: Bye Bye Wakey
why the gloom. If we win by 30 plus in our next two and warrington lose by 30 plus then we are 6th and in play off mode.
Sorry to see wakey go as a team, but as mentioned before the treatment we got off their fans accusing us of pay offs to teams, refs etc. Then I wont shed a tear
Sorry to see wakey go as a team, but as mentioned before the treatment we got off their fans accusing us of pay offs to teams, refs etc. Then I wont shed a tear
- Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:40 am
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: M.O.M????
- Replies: 19
- Views: 3257
Re: M.O.M????
Dumb footie in the conditions. I must admit I got a bit depressed when Tickle and Hock were on at the same time, both knocked on in crucial parts of the field. MOM had to be Orr once again, he and fletch were the only ones making breaks and looking confident.
- Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:35 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: (OFF TOPIC) ADVICE NEEDED!
- Replies: 18
- Views: 2902
Re: (OFF TOPIC) ADVICE NEEDED!
<r>Tell him to plead guilty, accept that his actions were foolish and he is really sorry for his speeding. They will accept no excuse, but in mitigation (theres that word again) he has to lay it on about the necessity for his license for his livelihood and his family situation. i.e the bread winner....
- Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:33 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: who's cheating again
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3192
Re: who's cheating again
Why didnt MO just claim to be Sthelens in mitigation when we came up for our hearing. We would have been given 2 points and compensated £50,000 for our trouble
Stains force another RFL Back down again
Stains force another RFL Back down again
- Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:28 pm
- Forum: Web Warriors
- Topic: RFL slur
- Replies: 20
- Views: 2807
Re: RFL slur
<r>having just watched boots n all it is obvious that the RFL are accusing us of corruption and cheating in that a statement was made, by the sky sports reporter, to say that any club seeking to mislead over the salary cap would be seriously financially penalized.<br/> Therefore; overspend = points ...