<t>Didn't someone say though that the reason that Feilden could not have 29 is because squad numbers have to be consequtive? in which case wouldn't it mean that we have to have a player 15 and 17 and they are just not listed for some other reason, or was the reason that feilden couldn't get 29 cos o...

<r>lol we posted the same thing at exactly the same time, ive took my thread off to avoid the fraggle, the story is also on the bbc website<br/> <br/> <URL url="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_league/6265893.stm"><LINK_TEXT text="http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 265893.stm">http://n...

i think if we get our form back we should return to "simply the best"

<t>I agree, i thought Hansen came on leaps and bounds lasst year and really showed good promise. To be honest i was very worried about the prop situation but having thought about it should we be that worried. Our back Row is very strong and has great depth so we have cover for props in the likes of ...

That would be rubbish it would be a perfect way for him to start again after his troubles at the end of last season and tri-nations

does this mean feilden will take his old number back do ya reckon?

<t>Yeah i agree i think what we ar missing really is a terry o'connor or a craig smith, a real workhorse prop. I know you could say feilden fills that roll but being an 80min prop i think dampens his impact sometimes were as o'connor woul give you a real good 20-30mins of drive. We could do with one...

Im glad of the idea to make the players quicker because i think that higham used to leave a lot of them for dead from the play of the ball with only ashton able to keep up most the time, it would be nice to see more support for him when he does his blast runs from dummy half

Signed a 2 year deal on the WW website now

unless he means since millward left thats the only thing i can think of