Oh dear. And for all the talk about 'we've got too many wingers'...

Certainly the only evidence I can see for any difference in tactics from Lam compared to last season is that Williams strays onto the right hand side of the field a bit more often. But, as others have noted, not to any great effect.

Fortunately (?) Huddersfield are a very ordinary side. A good side would have done.

pedro wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:14 am Siezer is still there aint he?

Yeah, I meant to partner him.

pedro wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 12:00 am Id be staggered if the Aussies are still circling

Me too. But who have the Raiders got? After getting rid of Austin, they've got who; Hingano and Cornish? Neither are amazing, but I'm not convinced GW is any better.

If we had players running lines off the ball-carrier and a pass had gone to ground, or even been intercepted, at least we could have said, we are trying things in attack. But there was none of that, and defensive organisation looks as bad as ever.

I think most fans would have been quite prepared to wait until half-way through the season to see the 'improved attacking play' we were promised, as long as we built on a foundation of decent organisation and solid defence. But all that has melted away, and the attack is worse than under Waney, when...

Lockers made 1 mistake i saw, the first was Powell passing to him when he was the dummy runner. Dummy runner? That'd be a first! There was a complete lack of running lines, hence our dull and ineffective one-out play out of defence. Pretty sure Lockers dropped the ball more than once, He seemed to ...

Firestarter wrote: ↑Wed Mar 06, 2019 7:25 pm Woods is signed up long term so whats the point of more passengers who arnt gonna play?

Well, indeed. Especially as you get the sense that maybe Smith has overtaken him in the pecking order.

I don't think Woods is better than Sammut.