As you say the clue is in the words “limited edition”snooze you loose affir with this type of stuff,that’s why after giving it a lot of thought,and that the magic shirt really grew on me,I decided to pre order it,big question for that one will it be in in time for the magic game? Hopefully, aren’t ...

It’d be quite alarming for a professional outfit to openly state “as a camp” that he isn’t fit for the job. I am sure Chris Brookes isn’t wanting blood nor too Tom OMalley Load of crap. Who’s mentioned openly stated ? These might be whispers between each other , I only said what had been said in ca...

Does the club want to make money or not????? Not the first time thishas happened Is it not a limited edition shirt? As in when hone its gone. Cant be angry at the club that you missed out. I imagine the magic weekend one will be the same. As you say the clue is in the words “limited edition”,snooze...

shaunedwardsfanclub wrote: ↑Sun Apr 21, 2019 11:26 pm There is plenty of money at Leeds, other clubs shouldn't have a look in really.

Yea I always thought Leeds had plenty of money behind them too

Entertaining game for sure but the defence at times looked hapless but it was end to end stuff,the young uns as usual gave it their all

All IL has to do is hold them to their contracts. Ok, if they go then we don't get a fee but it could allow time to find replacements. It might be considered good business if we got a fee then had to pay a fee for a Marquee replacement. With the salaries the NRL can pay it will be very difficult to...

All IL has to do is hold them to their contracts. Ok, if they go then we don't get a fee but it could allow time to find replacements. It might be considered good business if we got a fee then had to pay a fee for a Marquee replacement. With the salaries the NRL can pay it will be very difficult to...

In the car crash that is this season so far the 2 shining lights are young Smitheees and Partington,they do look the part so far,I hope they continue on.

jaws1 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 20, 2019 5:36 pm There was no need to flop on him when he knew he was injured could have made the injury worse.

I agree there was no need for the charge either the game was well won,just petulance on his part then to dive on him what was he thinking really

No ban for Peyroux According to the MRP "Player makes a low, reasonable approach into contact on opponent, demonstrating a wrapping motion. Opponent spins away from contact. Player’s back and shoulder make contact with the shoulder of player, resulting in potential whiplash motion to opponent....