Feka and Hansen

[Warrior4eva]

Both banned for one match for there involvement in the fight on Friday.

Both will miss Hull Kr match.

Who will nobby replace them with?

[ancientnloyal]

Thank god big Fek wont miss the Saints game

Hansen - Hill
Paleaaesina - OCarroll/Prescott

[Nicola#Warriors]

i assume he will start bailey at 2nd row with hock if he's back, if not i don't know. and then fielden and fletcher props with prescott/o'carroll on the bench

[roo67]

just read on sky sports that danny sculthorpe has not got a ban for stiking an opponent.how can we have 2 players with good records banned and a player with a patchy record at best gets off. also with no salford player ivolved at the hearing does this mean they were hitting each other?

[chrisJJ]

Feka - O'carroll
Hansen - hill

Fletch + Fielden at prop, o#carroll + hill on bench, we should have enough skill to beat hull kr with the likes of barrett, leuluai etc, Feka will be missed but he shouldnt change the game we should be winning these games if we dnt we cnt say 'ohh its because feka wasnt playin'

[cpwigan]

:conf: The RFL are mystifying

As I recall Wigan and Salford players traded punches. Yet only Wigan players are even asked to answer a charge and found guilty.

As Roo mentions, Danny Sculthorpe, a serial offender is found guilty of striking BUT no punishment.

Why even punish players for throwing handbags at each other

[jammie]

here we go again the rfl on a let's do wigan down mission,let's try and disrupt wigan any way we can.come rfl it's getting boreing now :sly: :sly:

[DaveO]

cpwigan posted:
:conf: The RFL are mystifying

As I recall Wigan and Salford players traded punches. Yet only Wigan players are even asked to answer a charge and found guilty.

As Roo mentions, Danny Sculthorpe, a serial offender is found guilty of striking BUT no punishment.

Hansen and Feka went out of their way to join in a fight that did not initially involve them. The RFL does not like this.

If Sculthorpe had done the same then yes there is a problem with that decision.

However if he was involved in the initial incident such as reacting to a punch thrown at him they take a more lenient view.

That said given our players have no bad disciplinary record I think a ban is a bit much as often far worse offences see players getting let off because they are not considered dirty.

Dave

[cpwigan]

The Morrison ban takes some wweighing up too. 3 matches to zero :conf:

[GeoffN]

DaveO posted:

cpwigan posted:
:conf: The RFL are mystifying

As I recall Wigan and Salford players traded punches. Yet only Wigan players are even asked to answer a charge and found guilty.

As Roo mentions, Danny Sculthorpe, a serial offender is found guilty of striking BUT no punishment.

Hansen and Feka went out of their way to join in a fight that did not initially involve them. The RFL does not like this.

That's pretty much how I saw it at the time.
The original incident involved DV & Littler, both of whom were sin-binned but otherwise unpunished.