Page 1 of 4
Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:40 pm
by ancientnloyal
Ok, here we go... it’s worth a debate now...
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:44 pm
by acwrlfc
He needs help and quickly being hung to dry by KR/IL
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:46 pm
by Warrior20
Yes, before he does any more damage.
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 9:49 pm
by Barney841
Lams interview. What?!?
I must of been watching a different game
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:00 pm
by Seinfeld79
And who would you bring in bearing in mind they'll only be here until the end of the season?
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:03 pm
by wall_of_voodoo
Realistically??!!
IMO he has 5 games to save his position (one he was going to loose anyway but that's another debate)
Salford away, Catalans home, Cas and Wakey away. Then the biggie. Bang around with poor performances/losses and endless excuses then I think Lam will be stood down and Lockers made player coach
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:05 pm
by ancientnloyal
Salford are in form
Catalans are tough or should be*
Cas are in form
Wakefield are in form
St. Helens are worse than Leeds so we will thrash them in Eddie H’s last game
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:08 pm
by ancientnloyal
Seinfeld79 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:00 pm
And who would you bring in bearing in mind they'll only be here until the end of the season?
I am sure our ex player Radlinski who is not out of his depth at all will hire another ex player of sorts to coach us. Koloi? Scott Quinell? Nathan McAvoy would be up for it
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 10:52 pm
by bill.inger
Send him back to PNP this week before he does any more damage. Tell SOL he's done playing and let him and Cassidy do the coaching for the rest of the season.
Smile, they said, it could be worse, so we all smiled and it got worse.
Things can only get better. I
Re: Should Lam be sacked?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:54 pm
by EagleEyePie
Lam will be given time, and to be fair I can understand why. A lot of people predicted we'd struggle this year - albeit not to this extent. He deserves a few more games to try to turn things around but his position is weaker than most coaches because he's only on a short term deal. If results don't change then it's not a huge decision to ask him to leave. The question is would Radlinski, Lam's biggest fan, be willing to let that happen? He's the one who oversees the performance aspect and presumably has the biggest say in the matter.
I wouldn't be surprised if we end the season with Winder as head coach though.