Squad v Toronto

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
ancientnloyal
Posts: 14143
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: Howe Bridge
Contact:

Squad v Toronto

Post by ancientnloyal » Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:58 pm

Well, is it about time to bring in Bullock and Manfredi?
Rugby, Family and Strava... that’s about it for me to be honest!

Http://ancientloyal.blogspot.com Blog about Wigan RLs Victorian and Inter-War past! Have a read! 🐦 @Ancientloyalblg

medlocke
Posts: 8358
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Contact:

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by medlocke » Mon Feb 10, 2020 8:06 pm

Hanky to 13 for me

Wiganer Ted
Posts: 2374
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:31 pm

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by Wiganer Ted » Mon Feb 10, 2020 8:09 pm

Bullock should have been in for the Wire game, after the Cas selection debacle he most certainly should be selected in the 17 against Toronto.
If Manfredi is fit then I reckon he should be given a run our in the reserves first.

Barney841
Posts: 687
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:24 am

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by Barney841 » Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:07 pm

medlocke wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 8:06 pm
Hanky to 13 for me
? How did you work that one out?

User avatar
wall_of_voodoo
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:51 am

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by wall_of_voodoo » Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:09 pm

Barney841 wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:07 pm
medlocke wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 8:06 pm
Hanky to 13 for me
? How did you work that one out?
I think he means into the starting thirteen
I'm a better fan than you
Because I don't "Boo"!!!

Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are :roll:

User avatar
wall_of_voodoo
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:51 am

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by wall_of_voodoo » Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:26 pm

ancientnloyal wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:58 pm
Well, is it about time to bring in Bullock and Manfredi?
Yes and No

Time to bring Bullock in - yes. Will Lam? Nope not a chance. I have more and more misgiving about Adrian Lam as our first team coach with almost every month that passes with him running/selecting the team as he does

Manfredi. - No.! Why risk him when he needs to be gaining game time in the reserves. No need to rush him despite Joe Burgess looking like he will be at Leigh next season
I'm a better fan than you
Because I don't "Boo"!!!

Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are :roll:

medlocke
Posts: 8358
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Contact:

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by medlocke » Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:29 pm

wall_of_voodoo wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:09 pm
Barney841 wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:07 pm
medlocke wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 8:06 pm
Hanky to 13 for me
? How did you work that one out?
I think he means into the starting thirteen
To replace O'Lockers when he goes, No point giving the position to one of the young guns, they'll soon go at the first sniff from the NRL, Hanky is a big lad, 13 is not a ball playing position anymore according too many on these sites, Plus he can kick goals, always handy to have 2 good kickers in the team and the money saved could be spent elsewhere like on a replacement for Powell :D

jackthelad
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:45 pm

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by jackthelad » Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:42 pm

medlocke wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:29 pm
wall_of_voodoo wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:09 pm
Barney841 wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:07 pm


? How did you work that one out?
I think he means into the starting thirteen
To replace O'Lockers when he goes, No point giving the position to one of the young guns, they'll soon go at the first sniff from the NRL, Hanky is a big lad, 13 is not a ball playing position anymore according too many on these sites, Plus he can kick goals, always handy to have 2 good kickers in the team and the money saved could be spent elsewhere like on a replacement for Powell :D
Wow meds do you know something we dont, Hank has played 13 before for Salford & Leigh U20's years ago
He can also pass a ball too!!

medlocke
Posts: 8358
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Contact:

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by medlocke » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:20 am

jackthelad wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 10:42 pm
medlocke wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:29 pm
wall_of_voodoo wrote:
Mon Feb 10, 2020 9:09 pm


I think he means into the starting thirteen
To replace O'Lockers when he goes, No point giving the position to one of the young guns, they'll soon go at the first sniff from the NRL, Hanky is a big lad, 13 is not a ball playing position anymore according too many on these sites, Plus he can kick goals, always handy to have 2 good kickers in the team and the money saved could be spent elsewhere like on a replacement for Powell :D
Wow meds do you know something we dont, Hank has played 13 before for Salford & Leigh U20's years ago
He can also pass a ball too!!
Didn't know that Jack, Would just like to see him play more and with Centres ahead of him why not try him at 13, It's one less player too have to worry about signing next season if it worked out

User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2536
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm

Re: Squad v Toronto

Post by Firestarter » Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:12 am

Greenwood and bullock in for me....... time for one of our backrowers to face the axe i think....... got to keep them playing for their places....... if powell is out then play tommy with borough on bench
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE

Post Reply