A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
He's much better down the left barney.....time for faz to be put on the right,or at loose forward.
That’s what I meant the left. Scored quite a few tries as well if I rememberFirestarter wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 3:04 pmHe's much better down the left barney.....time for faz to be put on the right,or at loose forward.
But what you have not priced in, is that the team is not selected on merit.ancientnloyal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:12 pm What was Radlinskis quote regarding Clark? “One of Super Leagues most devastating forwards”??
Laughable.
He can’t even get ahead of an unconditioned Burgess or kids At the minute
Doesn’t seem that way at present.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:24 pmBut what you have not priced in, is that the team is not selected on merit.ancientnloyal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:12 pm What was Radlinskis quote regarding Clark? “One of Super Leagues most devastating forwards”??
Laughable.
He can’t even get ahead of an unconditioned Burgess or kids At the minute
I can’t.bertina wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:36 pmDoesn’t seem that way at present.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 8:24 pmBut what you have not priced in, is that the team is not selected on merit.ancientnloyal wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 4:12 pm What was Radlinskis quote regarding Clark? “One of Super Leagues most devastating forwards”??
Laughable.
He can’t even get ahead of an unconditioned Burgess or kids At the minute
Bullock did quite well in the Leeds friendly, and along with Harry Smith he played well in the reserves against Widnes.
Then doesn’t even make the 21 man squad for the Cas game. You tell me.??
if one players is putting in his all, and is doing well. (and ISA is) why would you drop them for a player who didn't look good in preseason and didn't look good in the reserve match?DaveO wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 1:58 pmWell if Clark's not good enough whoever recruited him needs to follow him out the door. Mistakes like that at are inexcusable.Wigan_forever1985 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:16 pmWhat i meant by the Karl Pryce comment is Hes a great player that seems to be made of paper, admittedly hes a lot less injury prone than karl pryce but does seem to be an issue with himDaveO wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 12:06 pm
Greenwood along with Bateman formed the best 2nd row in the league when we won the GF so where this idea he's Karl Pryce MkII has come from I don't know. Yes I know he's had concussion and missed games as a result but if he can't get a game in front of the kids and more to the point looks behind them, what have the coaches been doing with him in the off season?
As to Clark I didn't say he should start but that he should figure. My point was the article read like he won't even be in the 17 with the only change to the props being Bullock. Picking both Bullock and Clark (even if Clark is used as impact off the bench) would at least go some way to making it look like Lam realised Clubb + juniors is not the way to go.
I totally agree with you re: clark but im guessing from the fact he never started nor was selected for most of the cas match squads - he just isnt good enough
Given all three of Bullock, Greenwood and Clarke are in the squad we will see who he picks. My guess is the most likely to miss out is Greenwood because Lam won't drop Isa.