Wigan v wakey
-
Firestarter
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
I think the switch of players havent done us any favours
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
-
superleague
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:38 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
Lets be honest we have been pretty shite this 2nd half and had a lucky try for bibby
Re: Wigan v wakey
Put manfredi centre must of been one of the worst decisions ever. On par with putting budgie in centreFirestarter wrote: ↑Sun Aug 09, 2020 5:04 pm I think the switch of players havent done us any favours
-
Wormburner
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:33 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
chuffing useless 
Let's is a contraction of “let us.” You use it to make suggestions about what you and someone else should do. Let's is NOT a promise
Re: Wigan v wakey
I hope this is first game gitters. If not could get absolutely tonked by a bigger team
-
superleague
- Posts: 1766
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:38 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
No one can defend that crap, long old finish to the season of thats the standard.
And WTF was lam thinking with swapping those positions of French, mandfredi and hardacre
And WTF was lam thinking with swapping those positions of French, mandfredi and hardacre
-
Firestarter
- Posts: 5525
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
Obviously it wasnt as we were terrible at salford last time out....... why we didnt pack the right side for the short kick off is beyond me.......one word match verdict PAINFUL
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Wigan v wakey
I said earlier that rustiness was excusable. That wasn’t rustiness, that was mis-management and complacency. SHOCKING PERFORMANCE.
-
southportcdm
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
Very relieved to get the win. I thought Wakey were unlucky (Bibby's 'try' wasn't) and we looked totally shot at the end. You can forgive some rustiness but we looked disjointed and perhaps only won because Tommy got injured and Harry played for longer than he would have done. Is Bevan not fully fit after his journey back to oz? We all know that Zak is a great fullback (and played really well) but we also know that we've looked better with Bevan at 1. Dom may have the physique of a centre but will take some time to adjust to that specialist position if he ever does so it seemed a strange move to play him there. There must have been a reason. I think Lammy got it right with the props and it looks like we may as well get used to playing without Lockers most of the time and just use him as a bonus player when he is fit. Let's hope next week shows a big improvement but the season will seem to pass by very quickly now.