Wigan v wakey
Re: Wigan v wakey
Good solidarity at the beginning. Good effort for the first game back. Nice to see Smith in the halves, I think with French at fb and Tommy spelling at hooker that's or best team. Not sure why French for our on the wing when Tommy went off. Overall a good base to start to build on.
Re: Wigan v wakey
Jon wilkin, who's cutting insight once took saints to 5 successive GF losses.
I have no doubt that held up stats are an accurate predictor of eventual winners of a game. Perhaps one of the most obvious indications other than the score though.
But why are people so negative about successful ex-wiganers on TV?
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Wigan v wakey
That’s quite easy they talk utter nonsense for the most part,give me an insight to the game then great I’ll listen but as they don’t I hit the mute button.Mike wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 3:22 am
Jon wilkin, who's cutting insight once took saints to 5 successive GF losses.
I have no doubt that held up stats are an accurate predictor of eventual winners of a game. Perhaps one of the most obvious indications other than the score though.
But why are people so negative about successful ex-wiganers on TV?
The best players rarely make decent commentators so I care not a jot about Wilkin’s playing career but he does add insight,for me at least and is easily the best co commentator out there.
One thing this break has shown to me is how utterly stale sky’s coverage is,if they renew the tv deal I hope they give it a freshen up on the presenting side,it’s as stale and smelly as the shark they caught in jaws
-
- Posts: 4179
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
Burgess looks soft and uninterested to me. Barely makes any yards running, no aggression in defence.
Shadow of the player he was a few years ago.
Shadow of the player he was a few years ago.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
Plusses:
Powell (possibly MOM)
Smith (generally)
Marshall
Farrell (as ever)
Hardaker (finally the player we all hoped he would be)
Havard (best forward in the match)
Byrne (bit of a blunt instrument but effective)
Minuses:
Burgess (apart from one run, looked unfit and straight from Madame Tussauds in defence)
Bibby (see Burgess for defence)
Clark - (worryingly lightweight for a prop)
Mysteries:
Where did French go in the second half - ditto Hastings until the last 10 minutes
How did Lam ever get the job as a coach?
What happened to discipline? Smithies in particular. I know we think he's the next SOL but keep your head together son.
That was a useful first half and then it was Salford all over again, except that Wakefield weren't as talented and weren't as well coached as Salford. Groundhog Day.
I don't fancy facing a good team at the moment - thank god it's Leeds next.
Powell (possibly MOM)
Smith (generally)
Marshall
Farrell (as ever)
Hardaker (finally the player we all hoped he would be)
Havard (best forward in the match)
Byrne (bit of a blunt instrument but effective)
Minuses:
Burgess (apart from one run, looked unfit and straight from Madame Tussauds in defence)
Bibby (see Burgess for defence)
Clark - (worryingly lightweight for a prop)
Mysteries:
Where did French go in the second half - ditto Hastings until the last 10 minutes
How did Lam ever get the job as a coach?
What happened to discipline? Smithies in particular. I know we think he's the next SOL but keep your head together son.
That was a useful first half and then it was Salford all over again, except that Wakefield weren't as talented and weren't as well coached as Salford. Groundhog Day.
I don't fancy facing a good team at the moment - thank god it's Leeds next.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5531
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
Ive just read that bevan hurt his back
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Wigan v wakey
I imagine after 5 months out there'll be plenty of niggles/injuries amongst most teams. It's how you cope with the issue that will determine success in a shortened season. We certainly have a big hole to fill if it's a lengthy absence.
Re: Wigan v wakey
Yeah it was Wilkin’s fault and his alone for the 5 GF defeats...
That’s like saying every time we lose it’s O’Loughlin’s fault?
I was talking about his commentary anyway. He is brilliant in the box and should be there more often.
-
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
It's a mystery why someone so unpleasant on the field can be really intelligent and a useful summariser. The sooner he retires the better,
-
- Posts: 4179
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Wigan v wakey
Clark lightweight?Southern Softy wrote: ↑Mon Aug 10, 2020 9:36 am Plusses:
Powell (possibly MOM)
Smith (generally)
Marshall
Farrell (as ever)
Hardaker (finally the player we all hoped he would be)
Havard (best forward in the match)
Byrne (bit of a blunt instrument but effective)
Minuses:
Burgess (apart from one run, looked unfit and straight from Madame Tussauds in defence)
Bibby (see Burgess for defence)
Clark - (worryingly lightweight for a prop)
Mysteries:
Where did French go in the second half - ditto Hastings until the last 10 minutes
How did Lam ever get the job as a coach?
What happened to discipline? Smithies in particular. I know we think he's the next SOL but keep your head together son.
That was a useful first half and then it was Salford all over again, except that Wakefield weren't as talented and weren't as well coached as Salford. Groundhog Day.
I don't fancy facing a good team at the moment - thank god it's Leeds next.
He was one of the biggest on the pitch.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."