I wouldn't necessarily blame anyone. Leeds were simply too good on the day.Lazy J wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:20 pmThis game has highlighted 2 things, Lam is out of his depth, the pack was too small Harvard should never have started, Bullock and even Flower would have offered more grunt, the bench was small Hankinson would have offered more grunt than Bibbykeptinthedarkfans wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:06 pm Lockers has gone but to blame this gutless shambles on him is ridiculous. There's 12 other clueless players out there if you must lambasting a scapegoat look no further than the coach. Completely out his depth.
But we can’t carry lockers for 2 short spells
Lockers
Re: Lockers
- Wigan_forever1985
- Posts: 6568
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm
Re: Lockers
Lockers is an embarrassment to the club and is already tarnishing his reputation with insisting on playing on
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
Re: Lockers
Needs to do the right thing for the club and himself and go from today
Re: Lockers
Lam picked a team that was totally unsuitable for the weather, the pack wasn’t big enough, and we tried to play our usuall game, Leeds smothered the life out of us in that first half, we got to the halfway line once in the first half then knocked on and invited Leeds onto us, and then we never got out of our half. We needed either bulk or a long kicking game to turn Leeds round. The weather was forecast for at least a week so we had time to prep to play in it. Lam didn’t come up with a plan that was suitable for the weather.
There are 10 types of people, those who get binary and those who dont!
Re: Lockers
Yes even Wane would have had a plan for those conditions
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am