Bullock

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Charriots Offiah
Posts: 4127
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm

Re: Bullock

Post by Charriots Offiah »

Barney841 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7402
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Bullock

Post by Mike »

Charriots Offiah wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Because he is being effective albeit in shorter spells than we'd like?
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Charriots Offiah
Posts: 4127
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm

Re: Bullock

Post by Charriots Offiah »

Mike wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 11:05 am
Charriots Offiah wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Because he is being effective albeit in shorter spells than we'd like?

He can’t be effective in a five minute spell? Do you have any statistics to support that claim Mike? That puts extra pressure on the other forwards. Personally, I think don’t think that Lam rates his defence.
Barney841
Posts: 2201
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:24 am

Re: Bullock

Post by Barney841 »

Charriots Offiah wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Bullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s why
moto748
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Bullock

Post by moto748 »

w.thomas wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 8:24 am I thought that I’d read somewhere than Ben kilner had left the club to pursue another career outside RL...or have I dreamt that!? I thought he looked like a brilliant prospect and has some size and natural aggression that our pack lacks.

You didn't imagine it, cos I remember that too!

Although whether it is correct, I have no idea. You would expect if he had left the Club, there would have been an official announcement.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 5445
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm

Re: Bullock

Post by Firestarter »

Well bullock is dropped or injured or even rested coz hes not playing tonight
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Ipinwigan
Posts: 260
Joined: Sat May 08, 2021 4:28 pm

Re: Bullock

Post by Ipinwigan »

What the hell is Lam playing at, no Bullock in the team and Mitch Clark gets a bench position?
Mitch Clark couldn't break out of a wet paper bag.
It also looks like Hardaker is on the wing?
Charriots Offiah
Posts: 4127
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm

Re: Bullock

Post by Charriots Offiah »

Barney841 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 2:37 pm
Charriots Offiah wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Barney841 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 9:46 am Bullock is our best prop and should start. Helps us get on the front foot.
Lam is getting it wrong unless he is carrying an injury….
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Bullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s why

Not defensively he isn’t.
Barney841
Posts: 2201
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 9:24 am

Re: Bullock

Post by Barney841 »

Charriots Offiah wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 7:28 pm
Barney841 wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 2:37 pm
Charriots Offiah wrote: Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am

Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Bullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s why

Not defensively he isn’t.
French isn’t great under the high ball but he’s played for his attack.
Some players have weaknesses but if they help the team in other ways, the other players cover for them
User avatar
jaws1
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Bullock

Post by jaws1 »

Good break from Clarke to set up French try
Post Reply