The forward was full of praise for the new Coaching staff: “He’s (Matt Pett) put a big emphasis on the culture around the squad,
I’m always telling them to proof read what they have typed before publishing an article it’s a professional club made to look amateurish.
Sometimes I think they just cut & paste snippets from other articles
Bloody hell, even Rads sent me a portion of his book to check through it before publishing!
Plus the official site is always behind social media for news & updates. The main site hasn’t been updated since this article was published on 18th December!
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
If only it was only related to us! The number of news reports, etc that I read with basic grammatical errors is ridiculous. At our place we issue reports and they ALL get QA'd before issue to the end customer. This is ALWAYS done by someone other than the author as you're unlikely to see your own errors. Its fairly simple. As mentioned above, just makes what should be a professional set up seen amateurish.
PoppaG wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 11:53 am
If only it was only related to us! The number of news reports, etc that I read with basic grammatical errors is ridiculous. At our place we issue reports and they ALL get QA'd before issue to the end customer. This is ALWAYS done by someone other than the author as you're unlikely to see your own errors. Its fairly simple. As mentioned above, just makes what should be a professional set up seen amateurish.
Accountants learn early that if you are adding up a long column of numbers (obviously I was doing this before XL came along) you add it from top to bottom the first time and the second time you add it from bottom to top, that shows any errors.
How many readers know the accountants other trick, if the difference between the two results is divisible by 9 that means you have reversed two numbers somewhere. Try it 27 becomes 72. Difference 45. 84 and 48, difference 36. Magic, sadly I am also old enough to know that in pre-decimal days the difference was divisible by 11!
Regarder une fille en bikini, c'est comme avoir un revolver chargé sur sa table:
Il n'y a rien de mal a ça mais il est difficile de penser à autre chose.
PoppaG wrote: ↑Tue Dec 21, 2021 11:53 am
If only it was only related to us! The number of news reports, etc that I read with basic grammatical errors is ridiculous. At our place we issue reports and they ALL get QA'd before issue to the end customer. This is ALWAYS done by someone other than the author as you're unlikely to see your own errors. Its fairly simple. As mentioned above, just makes what should be a professional set up seen amateurish.
Accountants learn early that if you are adding up a long column of numbers (obviously I was doing this before XL came along) you add it from top to bottom the first time and the second time you add it from bottom to top, that shows any errors.
How many readers know the accountants other trick, if the difference between the two results is divisible by 9 that means you have reversed two numbers somewhere. Try it 27 becomes 72. Difference 45. 84 and 48, difference 36. Magic, sadly I am also old enough to know that in pre-decimal days the difference was divisible by 11!
Ian, I worked in a dyehouse lab in the late 60s. We had a 20 ton delivery of bales of wool every week. Our fork truck driver brought me a list of the weights of each bale and I had to add up the total.
The columns were: T, Cwt, Qr, and Lb. (Tons, Hundredweight, Quarters and Pounds.)
As Monty Python's 4 Yorkshiremen would say: "Try tellin' the young uns today...."
you add it from top to bottom the first time and the second time you add it from bottom to top, that shows any errors. you add it from top to bottom the first time and the second time you add it from bottom to top, that shows any errors.
