Re: New Recruit?
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2018 5:14 pm
Now that Wanes gone will we sign players now that are the finished article not project players?
A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
Both I would think.pearsy wrote:Now that Wanes gone will we sign players now that are the finished article not project players?
Nothing to do with SW, IL holds the purse strings.pearsy wrote:Now that Wanes gone will we sign players now that are the finished article not project players?
It must have had something to do with Waney, I can't believe a coach wouldn't ask for certain players.old hooker wrote:Nothing to do with SW, IL holds the purse strings.pearsy wrote:Now that Wanes gone will we sign players now that are the finished article not project players?
Of course he would ask,but doesnt mean hed get them.No matter what people say Lenaghan does what he wants and that does not mean spending lots of money.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:It must have had something to do with Waney, I can't believe a coach wouldn't ask for certain players.old hooker wrote:Nothing to do with SW, IL holds the purse strings.pearsy wrote:Now that Wanes gone will we sign players now that are the finished article not project players?
. Like the £600,000 loss he topped up last year.old hooker wrote:Of course he would ask,but doesnt mean hed get them.No matter what people say Lenaghan does what he wants and that does not mean spending lots of money.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:It must have had something to do with Waney, I can't believe a coach wouldn't ask for certain players.old hooker wrote: Nothing to do with SW, IL holds the purse strings.
Or the amount he spent on players last year which was more than any other club. What do you want him to spend OH and on whom?jao711 wrote:. Like the £600,000 loss he topped up last year.old hooker wrote:Of course he would ask,but doesnt mean hed get them.No matter what people say Lenaghan does what he wants and that does not mean spending lots of money.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote: It must have had something to do with Waney, I can't believe a coach wouldn't ask for certain players.
You believe that he has given 600 ģrànd without a proviso that he will get it backjao711 wrote:. Like the £600,000 loss he topped up last year.old hooker wrote:Of course he would ask,but doesnt mean hed get them.No matter what people say Lenaghan does what he wants and that does not mean spending lots of money.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote: It must have had something to do with Waney, I can't believe a coach wouldn't ask for certain players.
Like it or not without him we would not be functioning!old hooker wrote:You believe that he has given 600 ģrànd without a proviso that he will get it backjao711 wrote:. Like the £600,000 loss he topped up last year.old hooker wrote: Of course he would ask,but doesnt mean hed get them.No matter what people say Lenaghan does what he wants and that does not mean spending lots of money.
then thats fine.IL is a hard nosed successful businessman and they give nothing away.That is not a criticism just a fact. I am just surprised that people are naive enough to think he is a good hearted benefactor.
So there isn't another potential owner or owners out there with deeper pockets? Or one(s) with a better ability to raise more revenue for the club through sponsorship than IL has managed?shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:Like it or not without him we would not be functioning!old hooker wrote:You believe that he has given 600 ģrànd without a proviso that he will get it backjao711 wrote:. Like the £600,000 loss he topped up last year.
then thats fine.IL is a hard nosed successful businessman and they give nothing away.That is not a criticism just a fact. I am just surprised that people are naive enough to think he is a good hearted benefactor.