New player

[pedro]

I doubt it as hes a part time DJ and a builder

[Mike]

.....rather not sign anyone and save the money instead of that kind of signing

Makes sense from a personal finance point of view, but why wouldn't we want to strengthen the team?

adding numbers isnt strengthening always, look at Clarke

I didn't say adding numbers. I said strengthening.

[pedro]

Makes sense from a personal finance point of view, but why wouldn't we want to strengthen the team?

adding numbers isnt strengthening always, look at Clarke

I didn't say adding numbers. I said strengthening.

I dont see him as that as hes 1 professional appearance and is 30 so less than Clark. I see him as adding numbers

[Mike]

adding numbers isnt strengthening always, look at Clarke

I didn't say adding numbers. I said strengthening.

I dont see him as that as hes 1 professional appearance and is 30 so less than Clark. I see him as adding numbers

Who? I was asking why someone thought we should save the money in general and not make any addtions to the squad, nothing about a specific player.

[pedro]

and I said id rather save money than sign some project player, if he doesnt play then its a waste, you said why would I not want to strengthen, so I have said how does he strengthen the squad the player mentioned.

[Barney841]

Should of maybe kept hold of Greenwood and used him as prop, as long as he stayed fit. Big lad with a good offload

[nathan_rugby]

Should of maybe kept hold of Greenwood and used him as prop, as long as he stayed fit. Big lad with a good offload

Why would Greenwood want to stay to be played out of position or be a sub/squad player at second row?

Mike/Pedro - You are both arguing about two separate things.

- Mike is talking from a general point of view
- Pedro is talking about this Luke Page rumour who is a 30 year old with only 1 NRL appearance

[pedro]

Should of maybe kept hold of Greenwood and used him as prop, as long as he stayed fit. Big lad with a good offload

Why would Greenwood want to stay to be played out of position or be a sub/squad player at second row?

Mike/Pedro - You are both arguing about two separate things.

- Mike is talking from a general point of view
- Pedro is talking about this Luke Page rumour who is a 30 year old with only 1 NRL appearance

ah thought he was talking about page as he responded to my post which was replying about Page

[Barney841]

Should of maybe kept hold of Greenwood and used him as prop, as long as he stayed fit. Big lad with a good offload

Why would Greenwood want to stay to be played out of position or be a sub/squad player at second row?

And who says he wanted like to play as prop?

[Mike]

Should of maybe kept hold of Greenwood and used him as prop, as long as he stayed fit. Big lad with a good offload

Why would Greenwood want to stay to be played out of position or be a sub/squad player at second row?

Mike/Pedro - You are both arguing about two separate things.

- Mike is talking from a general point of view
- Pedro is talking about this Luke Page rumour who is a 30 year old with only 1 NRL appearance

ah thought he was talking about page as he responded to my post which was replying about Page

No it was a reply to someone who just said we should save the money and not spend it now. They weren't talking about a specific player.

I reckon if someone is available who strengthens the squad we go for it, no point in saving salary cap, you gain nothing.