Page 6 of 8

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2021 4:36 pm
by josie andrews
nathan_rugby wrote: Wed Sep 15, 2021 3:53 pm
medlocke wrote: Wed Sep 15, 2021 2:45 pm
nathan_rugby wrote: Wed Sep 15, 2021 1:10 pm

Ahh right, so Pete is defence coach and Winder attack?

Point still stands though, to say its pointless bringing Briers in is garbage.
Prove it
You're a strange bloke.
😂😂

Lee Briers

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2021 8:09 pm
by DaveO
nathan_rugby wrote:
DaveO wrote: Tue Sep 14, 2021 3:58 pm
nathan_rugby wrote:
I assume you know their contracts are being terminated then rather then expiring?
No I am assuming they are expiring. Which is exactly why I said
in my previous post in this thread if IL organised it that head coaches and assistant coaches contracts ran together he’d never have to pay anyone off given he never sacks head coaches.

There is actually no expense if you organise it like this so my point is it’s a false argument to suggest there is.
Quite mis leading to say “the sort IL says is too expensive” because there are two different situations.
1 - assumptions coaches contracts expiring (Warrington)
2 - coaches whose contracts not all expiring at same time (Wigan)

I do agree however that it would make life easier if all the back room staff had contracts in sync with each other but it seems an impossible task. Would everyone have accepted a one year contract when Lam came in?
Well there you have a reason why it’s a nutty idea to have coaches on a one year rolling contract. Once Edwards wasn’t coming they should have offered Lam a two or three year deal. If they weren’t confident he was good enough for such an offer he shouldn’t have been given the job.

There are two situations but what is misleading is IL saying it’s too expensive to do this implying it will never happen when if he got the contracts in sync there is no obstacle.

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2021 8:12 pm
by medlocke
nathan_rugby wrote: Wed Sep 15, 2021 3:53 pm
medlocke wrote: Wed Sep 15, 2021 2:45 pm
nathan_rugby wrote: Wed Sep 15, 2021 1:10 pm

Ahh right, so Pete is defence coach and Winder attack?

Point still stands though, to say its pointless bringing Briers in is garbage.
Prove it
You're a strange bloke.
Not wrong there Nathan :lol:

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:54 pm
by saint
Winder & Briers . Get used to it!

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:18 pm
by keptinthedarkfans
saint wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:54 pm Winder & Briers . Get used to it!
Sorry Not going to happen

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:26 pm
by medlocke
keptinthedarkfans wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:18 pm
saint wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:54 pm Winder & Briers . Get used to it!
Sorry Not going to happen
Why?

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Sat Sep 18, 2021 11:35 pm
by Charriots Offiah
medlocke wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:26 pm
keptinthedarkfans wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:18 pm
saint wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 7:54 pm Winder & Briers . Get used to it!
Sorry Not going to happen
Why?
Winders contract is up.

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2021 8:13 am
by medlocke
Charriots Offiah wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 11:35 pm
medlocke wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:26 pm
keptinthedarkfans wrote: Sat Sep 18, 2021 8:18 pm

Sorry Not going to happen
Why?
Winders contract is up.
ok

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2021 12:45 pm
by saint
Watch this space gang !

Re: Lee Briers

Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2021 3:31 pm
by Gaznier
Would like to see goulding involved.

Peet
Goulding

With Wane helping