I,VE NOT HEARD .....

gillysmyhero · Post by **gillysmyhero** » Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:59 pm

Cullen comment on how the punishment should fit the crime after Westwood was sent off for what looked to be a blatant attack to the head with intent. Hypocrite is what springs to mind.

butt monkey · Post by **butt monkey** » Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:03 am

Adrian Morley is at the judiciary too for another high tackle.

the-Bowtun-Warrior · Post by **the-Bowtun-Warrior** » Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:27 am

for a change!

butt monkey · Post by **butt monkey** » Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:34 am

He hasn't been for a week or so!

josie andrews · Post by **josie andrews** » Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:56 pm

gillysmyhero wrote:Cullen comment on how the punishment should fit the crime after Westwood was sent off for what looked to be a blatant attack to the head with intent. Hypocrite is what springs to mind.

He got off with it, Westwood was only given a one match ban and fined Â£300 for a reckless high tackle. Fa'savalu got off with running into the melee and throwing a punch, that the sending off was sufficient. McIllorum was cleared but given a formal warning :conf: :conf:

I,VE NOT HEARD .....

I,VE NOT HEARD .....

Re: I,VE NOT HEARD .....

Re: I,VE NOT HEARD .....

Re: I,VE NOT HEARD .....

Re: I,VE NOT HEARD .....