Smellys v Cas

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
fozzieskem
Posts: 3347
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Smellys v Cas

Post by fozzieskem » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:40 pm

Firestarter wrote:
Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:33 pm
fozzieskem wrote:
Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:28 pm
Didn’t think Makinson was that type of player big ban incoming I think
which player did he do it on?
Watts of all people,I mean he really went for it too looked like he was appraising a vase...

User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2791
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm

Re: Smellys v Cas

Post by Firestarter » Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:49 pm

fozzieskem wrote:
Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:40 pm
Firestarter wrote:
Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:33 pm
fozzieskem wrote:
Sun Aug 16, 2020 8:28 pm
Didn’t think Makinson was that type of player big ban incoming I think
which player did he do it on?
Watts of all people,I mean he really went for it too looked like he was appraising a vase...
haha be on porn hub next week then
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE

Nezza Faz
Posts: 1603
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: Smellys v Cas

Post by Nezza Faz » Mon Aug 17, 2020 9:32 am

Wasn't too sure he meant it, but he did seem to keep his hands full for some time. If he'd realized his grab bag straight away, he'd have let go immediately, surely ?
It's a Grade F offence which is 8 matches and I don't know if that can be reduced, even if he claims it wasn't on purpose. And as other posters have said, he's not that type of player, has a good disciplinary record but not sure that can be taken into consideration for this particular offence ?
Saints could be hit with a few players missing as Percival is likely to be out for 4-6 weeks and James Graham looks to be carrying an injury, together with Makinson's suspension.

widdenoldboy
Posts: 361
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 10:25 pm

Re: Smellys v Cas

Post by widdenoldboy » Tue Aug 18, 2020 10:05 pm

Watts didn't flinch - you've got to admire his, well, balls :D :D :D :D

Post Reply