Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
Post Reply
josie andrews
Posts: 35732
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by josie andrews »

SAINTS coach Kristian Woolf has expressed his disappointment that the tackle that led to James Bentley being ruled out for an indefinite period with spinal ligament damage has gone unpunished.

Bentley left the field and is now seeing specialists to ascertain the full extent of the injury – and is fearful of it being an extended period on the sidelines for the dogged second rower.

Although Catalans heavyweight prop Sam Kasiano was sin-binned for the tackle no further action has been taken following the incident.

Woolf said: “It is not a real good one, James has got some ligament damage around his spine as a result of a crusher tackle.

“It is really disappointing that you have a tackle that is seen as a sin-bin on the field, resulting in an indefinite sort of injury in which we don’t quite know what the time frame is going to be there, yet the match review committee find that there is no charge to be laid there.

“I don’t think it was intentional from Sam Kasiano at all – accidents happen in our game and I am not pointing fingers there at all.

“But I am disappointed with the match review committee because I don’t think they have protected our player.

“There were enough pictures and different camera angles shown in the game, that it was obvious a bad position that he has been put in and a dangerous crusher tackle.”

The match review panel in deemed there was no charge for the incident, stating: “Attacking player (Bentley) tucks his head and is part of the actions of the tackle in pulling the defending player (Kasiano) onto him.”

https://www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/19 ... s-bentley/
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by fozzieskem »

It was a clear crusher tackle but I do t think there was any malice in it so the sin binning was the correct decision,run at a big lump of a man and sadly accident happen
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 5525
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by Firestarter »

Unfortunately for bentley what goes around comes around
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
the pieman
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 5:34 pm

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by the pieman »

unfortunately the Crusher type tackle is another one of those where the attacker can play the referee so to speak. I dont believe it has happened as much this season, but the previous 2-3 years it was almost every game that was being stopped because of it

generally in the game of RL the attacker will run forwards into or across the defenders and the problem doesnt happen. In the previous 2-3 years we had more instances of the player seemingly backing into the defender and doubling over, get up, hold neck / head, and slow play down so that the ref gives a penalty and bins / sends off the opposition player. Player gets up and carries on

whilst some will be crusher, there was also quite a lot where the player was milking the penalty

i havent seen the one from weekend, but have no sympathy for Saints as their fans dont believe they ever do anything wrong on the pitch and Bentley is a grub of a player who looks like he can dish it out but dont like taking it back
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by fozzieskem »

Little doubt Bentley tucked his head as he went into Kasiano pure accident to me but he did land on Bentley for sure but no malice in it
Dan2266
Posts: 1300
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:47 pm

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by Dan2266 »

fozzieskem wrote: Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:54 pm Little doubt Bentley tucked his head as he went into Kasiano pure accident to me but he did land on Bentley for sure but no malice in it
Roby made a big contribution if you re watch it as well....
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by fozzieskem »

Dan2266 wrote: Wed Sep 08, 2021 4:10 pm
fozzieskem wrote: Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:54 pm Little doubt Bentley tucked his head as he went into Kasiano pure accident to me but he did land on Bentley for sure but no malice in it
Roby made a big contribution if you re watch it as well....
Not really he pushed big Sam but that’s all and goes down on the ball by the side of Bentley/Kasiano is all I feel
Dan2266
Posts: 1300
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2019 11:47 pm

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by Dan2266 »

fozzieskem wrote: Wed Sep 08, 2021 6:07 pm
Dan2266 wrote: Wed Sep 08, 2021 4:10 pm
fozzieskem wrote: Wed Sep 08, 2021 1:54 pm Little doubt Bentley tucked his head as he went into Kasiano pure accident to me but he did land on Bentley for sure but no malice in it
Roby made a big contribution if you re watch it as well....
Not really he pushed big Sam but that’s all and goes down on the ball by the side of Bentley/Kasiano is all I feel
Fair enough, looked to me at full speed that big Sam fell the way he did because of the Roby contact and where his feet subsequently ended up
Jonathon Kerr (JK)
Posts: 198
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:29 pm

Re: Kristain Woolf disappointed with response to tackle on James Bentley

Post by Jonathon Kerr (JK) »

Whenever a player decides to back into the tackle, there is always a chance for this to happen. Not all of them should lead to further bans, and as others have said, sin binning was sufficient.
Post Reply