Sounds like someone misses us....
Sounds like someone misses us....
Everything they do is so dramatic and flamboyant. It just makes me want to set myself on fire!
Re: Sounds like someone misses...
I would have him back but I know a lot of people on this forum wouldn’t.
- warriors10
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 7:01 pm
Re: Sounds like someone mi...
I would love him back!Banksy posted:
I would have him back but I know a lot of people on this forum wouldn’t.
-
- Posts: 2394
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sounds like someone misses...
i would have him back without a shadow of a doubt.....
we need a big powerful ooker to go with higham's speed.....
we need a big powerful ooker to go with higham's speed.....
-
- Posts: 4711
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 3:08 pm
Re: Sounds like someone mi...
miss us all he wants, don't want him back.
penalty machine, not a position we need to be buying for, money can be spent on positions were we need players.
don't need him, don't want him. end of.
penalty machine, not a position we need to be buying for, money can be spent on positions were we need players.
don't need him, don't want him. end of.
"what ever happens... we stick together... we stay together... we survive."
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Re: Sounds like someone mi...
This season see's Terry carrying on his great Trophgy winning career with yet another trophy less season, say what you want about his ability, but every team he has been in has been quite unsuccesfull when it come to trophys, IMO the guy is a jinx, let Bradford have a few with no success
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Re: Sounds like someone mi...
Blocks he actually said that.....come back Tez"I was tremendously impressed by their great team ethic.
Campions of the rugby world.
Re: Sounds like someone mi...
If we were to have Terry back (and I think that it would be a mistake), who are we going to get rid of?
Mike McIllorum has to start playing more regularly for the first team to continue his development; so does everyone that wants Terry back think we should get rid of Higham?
There is no guarantee that Millard is retiring yet either!
Mike McIllorum has to start playing more regularly for the first team to continue his development; so does everyone that wants Terry back think we should get rid of Higham?
There is no guarantee that Millard is retiring yet either!
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?
Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?
Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
- ince warrior
- Posts: 791
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 7:19 pm
Re: Sounds like someone mi...
to be honest i don't agree with that at all... millard's career could be well over and he's aging anyway, while McIlorum isn't experienced enough to be a full-time SL hooker yet... i quite like the hooker rotation system and i think a Higham-Newton combination would be quality for us.- psycho - posted:
miss us all he wants, don't want him back.
penalty machine, not a position we need to be buying for, money can be spent on positions were we need players.
don't need him, don't want him. end of.
WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGAN!!!
WRLFC & SCFC FOR LIFE!!!
WE HATE LATICS, SAINTS, MACCLESFIELD, BURNLEY, CITY, LEEDS, WIRE AND WREXHAM!!!!
WRLFC & SCFC FOR LIFE!!!
WE HATE LATICS, SAINTS, MACCLESFIELD, BURNLEY, CITY, LEEDS, WIRE AND WREXHAM!!!!
Re: Sounds like someone mi...
And how much would it cost on the salary cap? With Higham and McIllorum already contracted to the club next year we don't need a third hooker to replace Millard.ince warrior posted:to be honest i don't agree with that at all... millard's career could be well over and he's aging anyway, while McIlorum isn't experienced enough to be a full-time SL hooker yet... i quite like the hooker rotation system and i think a Higham-Newton combination would be quality for us.- psycho - posted:
miss us all he wants, don't want him back.
penalty machine, not a position we need to be buying for, money can be spent on positions were we need players.
don't need him, don't want him. end of.
I don't agree McIllorum is not ready. He is IMO ready for the no. 2 hookers role and I thought he was very unlucky to get dropped when Millard got (relatively) fit again. McIllorum got some game time this season and he needs more next.
If we did have a Newton/Higham combination McIllorum would not get a look in and that would be a mistake as he represents the future in that position being one of the U21 players who does look likely to make it at top level. How old is Newton anyway?
Dave