Sounds like someone misses us....

[Glynola]

http://www.wigantoday.net/warriors-news ... 3368401.jp[/url]

[Banksy]

I would have him back but I know a lot of people on this forum wouldn’t.

[warriors10]

Banksy posted:
I would have him back but I know a lot of people on this forum wouldn’t.

I would love him back!

[shawcross da warrior]

i would have him back without a shadow of a doubt.....


we need a big powerful ooker to go with higham's speed.....

[- psycho -]

miss us all he wants, don't want him back.

penalty machine, not a position we need to be buying for, money can be spent on positions were we need players.

don't need him, don't want him. end of.

[medlocke]

This season see's Terry carrying on his great Trophgy winning career with yet another trophy less season, say what you want about his ability, but every team he has been in has been quite unsuccesfull when it come to trophys, IMO the guy is a jinx, let Bradford have a few with no success

[Antwigan]

"I was tremendously impressed by their great team ethic.

Blocks he actually said that.....come back Tez

[Matthew]

If we were to have Terry back (and I think that it would be a mistake), who are we going to get rid of?

Mike McIllorum has to start playing more regularly for the first team to continue his development; so does everyone that wants Terry back think we should get rid of Higham?

There is no guarantee that Millard is retiring yet either!

[ince warrior]

- psycho - posted:
miss us all he wants, don't want him back.

penalty machine, not a position we need to be buying for, money can be spent on positions were we need players.

don't need him, don't want him. end of.

to be honest i don't agree with that at all... millard's career could be well over and he's aging anyway, while McIlorum isn't experienced enough to be a full-time SL hooker yet... i quite like the hooker rotation system and i think a Higham-Newton combination would be quality for us.

[DaveO]

ince warrior posted:

- psycho - posted:
miss us all he wants, don't want him back.

penalty machine, not a position we need to be buying for, money can be spent on positions were we need players.

don't need him, don't want him. end of.

to be honest i don't agree with that at all... millard's career could be well over and he's aging anyway, while McIlorum isn't experienced enough to be a full-time SL hooker yet... i quite like the hooker rotation system and i think a Higham-Newton combination would be quality for us.

And how much would it cost on the salary cap? With Higham and McIllorum already contracted to the club next year we don't need a third hooker to replace Millard.

I don't agree McIllorum is not ready. He is IMO ready for the no. 2 hookers role and I thought he was very unlucky to get dropped when Millard got (relatively) fit again. McIllorum got some game time this season and he needs more next.

If we did have a Newton/Higham combination McIllorum would not get a look in and that would be a mistake as he represents the future in that position being one of the U21 players who does look likely to make it at top level. How old is Newton anyway?

Dave