leeds v stains
- warriorwal
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 4:07 pm
leeds v stains
as if it aint bad enough watching stains on a fri night after a week at work cullen is sky guest shouldnt he be at home filling in job applications with big big words .god i hate him bet you cant guess lol
Re: leeds v stains
Saints's first try was obstruction on Sinfield.
Apart from that, the officials have had quite a good game in my opinion.
Apart from that, the officials have had quite a good game in my opinion.
- warriorwal
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 4:07 pm
Re: leeds v stains
well second half wat a biased tw3t . red card fat welsh pig wasnt even injured yellow at most god ganson you are the biggest cheat in rugby league .bet he is looking forward to a night in with sean the tart long tomoz night nobead
- warriorwal
- Posts: 419
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 4:07 pm
Re: leeds v stains
wat the hell has sean long got tattooed on his fingers looked like mum to me lol
Re: leeds v stains
Turf it wasn't obstruction. It was a fair try. The sending off was fine. HOWEVER, do I think Ganson was unbiased? NO. Leeds had an early lead in the penalty count with Saints being penalised for offsides. From then on, Leeds got hammered for penalties whilst Saints became angelic. The short 10 really made a huge difference for Saints. The penalty to Saints for Long pushing the Leeds player over twice was a farce. The supposed high tackles, there were plenty by Saints. Meli swung his arm to stop Smith on his break. Ganson influenced that game far more than he should have done. Remember, penalties are important but an unequal 10 yards is a bigger killer.
Re: leeds v stains
It's probably the number for his nearest Ladbrookes!warriorwal wrote: wat the hell has sean long got tattooed on his fingers looked like mum to me lol
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?
Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?
Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
Re: leeds v stains
Why??? I am all confused now???? :conf: :conf:cpwigan wrote:Turf it wasn't obstruction.
There was one JUST like that one tonight, turned DOWN in the Harlequins vs Leeds game last week by the VR by Ben Thaler.
Tonight, it was Ashley Klein in the VR box.
Is it not down to interpretation???? :conf: :conf:
Re: leeds v stains
No player was denied the opportunity to make a tackle.
Re: leeds v stains
Sinifield????? :conf: :conf:
Re: leeds v stains
Who?turf wrote:Sinifield????? :conf: :conf:
Gareth Thomas before his first game: "You wanna spend 10 mins getting smashed up by these guys..Big dudes here.."