so we should have dropped the GB fullback and got rid to keep a reserve player? :eh:Doveoverdave wrote:And neither was he the player he was. He should have been cut and the FB position gone to Briscoe. Admittedly a far inferior player but the succession would have been complete and the salary cap enhanced and we would not now be scuffling around for anybody to play FB, the weakest position now at the club.Wigan weren't anywhere near the dominant force that they had been.The worst decision in a generation at Wigan to discard the finest half back for a decade. Once again the natural succesion of a key position was missed and we are still trying to fill the void.Bearing in mind how quickly the club discarded players when it looked like they had no future; (long being a prime example)But he did, didn't he? So was injury his prime motivation for going?When Radlinski realised that he would not be able to return from injuryHe is to be commended on this offer.He then came out of retirement
However the fact that the club took up the offer just showed how far the club had fallen to depend on a once great player limp about on his broken body to help us.
Ye Gods, how poor must the team be, this decision held the club up to ridicule. It should have thanks but no thanks!No he didn't and a good job too 'cos he'd have been sued and would still have been unable to represent the club. Rads had no contract to break and if he had he would have been unable to fulfill his great gesture.Did Farrell offer to break his contract with Saracens to come back?
Another to union
Re: Another to union
-
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am
Re: Another to union
He was crocked then.fitzy wrote:so we should have dropped the GB fullback and got rid to keep a reserve player? :eh:Doveoverdave wrote:And neither was he the player he was. He should have been cut and the FB position gone to Briscoe. Admittedly a far inferior player but the succession would have been complete and the salary cap enhanced and we would not now be scuffling around for anybody to play FB, the weakest position now at the club.Wigan weren't anywhere near the dominant force that they had been.The worst decision in a generation at Wigan to discard the finest half back for a decade. Once again the natural succesion of a key position was missed and we are still trying to fill the void.Bearing in mind how quickly the club discarded players when it looked like they had no future; (long being a prime example)But he did, didn't he? So was injury his prime motivation for going?When Radlinski realised that he would not be able to return from injuryHe is to be commended on this offer.He then came out of retirement
However the fact that the club took up the offer just showed how far the club had fallen to depend on a once great player limp about on his broken body to help us.
Ye Gods, how poor must the team be, this decision held the club up to ridicule. It should have thanks but no thanks!No he didn't and a good job too 'cos he'd have been sued and would still have been unable to represent the club. Rads had no contract to break and if he had he would have been unable to fulfill his great gesture.Did Farrell offer to break his contract with Saracens to come back?
And yes a bold decision was needed at the club.
Re: Another to union
And how popular would that have been with the fans...Doveoverdave wrote: He was crocked then.
And yes a bold decision was needed at the club.
Briscoe hasn't exactly turned out to be a world beater at either Hull club - has he?
"And Martin Offiah, trying to make some space, now then..." - Ray French, Wembley 1994
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?
Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
Interviewer: So that obviously means that you're not going to St Helens and you're not going to Leeds?
Frano: I don't know why I would ever want to go to St Helens or Leeds
------------------------------------------------
-
- Posts: 1949
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am
Re: Another to union
Not popular at all-that is not the point.Matthew wrote:And how popular would that have been with the fans...Doveoverdave wrote: He was crocked then.
And yes a bold decision was needed at the club.
Briscoe hasn't exactly turned out to be a world beater at either Hull club - has he?
Briscoe is no world beater but better than the tripe we have had at full back that includes the current encumbent.
-
- Posts: 5416
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:38 pm
Re: Another to union
Isn't hindsight wonderful!Doveoverdave wrote:Not popular at all-that is not the point.Matthew wrote:And how popular would that have been with the fans...Doveoverdave wrote: He was crocked then.
And yes a bold decision was needed at the club.
Briscoe hasn't exactly turned out to be a world beater at either Hull club - has he?
Briscoe is no world beater but better than the tripe we have had at full back that includes the current encumbent.

[img]http://www.webdeveloper.com/animations/ ... monkey.gif[/img]
The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.
The best form of defence is attack!!
Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!
The biggest Room is the Room for improvement.
The best form of defence is attack!!
Out of the black and into the red, remember you don't get anything for two in a bed!!