The Actual Licenses

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
Post Reply
nathan_rugby
Posts: 4185
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm

The Actual Licenses

Post by nathan_rugby »

Warrington, Leeds and Hull FC got an A grade license.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
DaveO
Posts: 15910
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: The Actual Licenses

Post by DaveO »

We got B and how on earth Wire got an A is totally beyond me.

WARRINGTON WOLVES

The club plays in a quality new stadium which in all but one or two aspects is excellent. Further ground improvements are planned and although financial projections are challenging, the club has a good record in this area. The club has strong sponsorship packages and a good commercial plan. The club has performed reasonably well in Super League and has invested well in its playing infrastructure and now needs to start contesting major finals and semi-finals. At this stage it is not yet developing Club Trained internationals.

All the bits on bold are negatives and I think the "financial projections being challenging" is code for "you are making it up" but really how can a such a long established club that has yet to develop club trained internationals ever get an A for that reason alone?

Dave
warrior till i die
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2003 11:55 pm

Re: The Actual Licenses

Post by warrior till i die »

next time around I expect us to have an A grade

sort the turnover out
and then salary cap breaches will be behind us


I wonder what widnes got!
ancient and loyal upon my chest
they are men of wigans best
a team that playyyyyyed the wigan way
and won the championship in may

jim sullivan he was the king
brian mctigueee and jonny ring
a team that playyyyyed the wigan way
and won the championship in may

when eric ashton was alive
with billy boston by his side
dave bolton and billy blan
oh what a time to be a fan!

in 85, at wem ber ley
john ferguson and brett kenny
a team that played the wigan way
and won the challenge cup in may

in 95 we won them all
tuigamala, faz and paul
a team that playyyyyed the wigan way
and won the championship in may

Ancient and loyal upon my chest
they are men of wigans best
a team that playyyyyyed the wigan way
and won the championship in may.
User avatar
mikey-warriors
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:03 pm

Re: The Actual Licenses

Post by mikey-warriors »

And leigh tbh eight teams with a C licence
:conf:
Perpignan 2009

remember remember the 21st of september wigan 31 - 30 bradford


User avatar
phil.freda
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon May 17, 2004 10:01 pm

Re: The Actual Licenses

Post by phil.freda »

how the hell have stains got an A
sh-t ground bad attendence no facilities women can't even have a pee total disgrace
User avatar
mikey-warriors
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:03 pm

Re: The Actual Licenses

Post by mikey-warriors »

they ot a b off the rfl thats all what matters to me if they would have got a point for ground i would of gone to thr rfl in person :lol:
Perpignan 2009

remember remember the 21st of september wigan 31 - 30 bradford


DaveO
Posts: 15910
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: The Actual Licenses

Post by DaveO »

phil.freda wrote:how the hell have stains got an A
sh-t ground bad attendence no facilities women can't even have a pee total disgrace
They didn't. They got B.

Dave
Doveoverdave
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am

Re: The Actual Licenses

Post by Doveoverdave »

warrior till i die wrote:next time around I expect us to have an A grade

sort the turnover out
and then salary cap breaches will be behind us


I wonder what widnes got!
What an earth a salary cap breach has to do with a franchise application is beyond me.

Did not Saints break the cap rules?

There ought to be more emphasis on facilities so that the sporting public don't have to put up with Saints, Cas, Wakey, Salford, HKR and now Celtic.

Half the games played in Victorian dilapadated sheds.

A huge backward step to ignore facilities ALREADY in place at Widnes, Leigh, Doncaster, Halifax(?)Etc.
Post Reply