Team v Wakey

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Chorley Pie eater
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:41 am

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by Chorley Pie eater »

If IL or MH come on this site for gods sake get rid of numpty Nobby, excluding Shaun Ainscough from the team is a total disgrace no matter what Nobby's excuse is, it's not good enough for the fans who help pay the wages. No other team would exclude the top score tryer in the team thats just stupidity or is numpty embarressed because he prefers older players to the young ones despite what rubbish he has spurted out in the past .
User avatar
fitzy
Posts: 789
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:44 am

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by fitzy »

I cannot believe noble he is an absolute prat and I would now definatley want him to be sacked. Would leeds ir saints or any other team for that matter drop the top try scorer? duty of care I don't know about that ainscough and tomkins are the two fitess players in the squad
ancientnloyal
Posts: 14533
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: Howe Bridge
Contact:

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by ancientnloyal »

Are there any reasons for ainscough's absence?

leaving out our top scorer, super leagues top scorer (in less games than most of his rivals) needs to have a good excuse
https://www.ancientandloyal.com/

Now on Bluesky Social Media posting regularly pre-War snippets
https://bsky.app/profile/ancientandloyal.com
sai
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:09 pm

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by sai »

I have heard that Ainscough has been dropped due to the fact that if he plays’ a certain amount of first team games around 15 that his wage would have to go up.
So he will be playing for the under 21.
If this is true then this is the final straw for me as I have to watch over paid players like Fielding week in week out.
i hope i am wrong
highland convert
Posts: 2526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:44 pm

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by highland convert »

However Sai it would make sense. With Gleeson the budget may be very tight. To play him and wage increase could overspend the cap. Better to save his games for later in the season and cup possibly, Jim
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by turf »

ancientnloyal wrote:Are there any reasons for ainscough's absence?

leaving out our top scorer, super leagues top scorer (in less games than most of his rivals) needs to have a good excuse
That is what I am trying to figure out ancientnloyal, but at the moment, I am rather :conf: and :angry: and :eusa17: about why Noble has dropped poor Ainscough.

I feel massively sorry for the young lad Ainscough, because he has done nothing to warrant what Noble has done to him.

I flamin well hope he takes Ainscough to Edinburgh (spelling) against Saints!!!! :angry: :angry: :angry:
FROM A TO B
Posts: 5038
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:07 pm
Contact:

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by FROM A TO B »

turf wrote:
ancientnloyal wrote:Are there any reasons for ainscough's absence?

leaving out our top scorer, super leagues top scorer (in less games than most of his rivals) needs to have a good excuse
That is what I am trying to figure out ancientnloyal, but at the moment, I am rather :conf: and :angry: and :eusa17: about why Noble has dropped poor Ainscough.

I feel massively sorry for the young lad Ainscough, because he has done nothing to warrant what Noble has done to him.

I flamin well hope he takes Ainscough to Edinburgh (spelling) against Saints!!!! :angry: :angry: :angry:
why feel sorry for him, he's a young lad with a very bright future in the game.
wouldn't be suprised if it is a financial reason for him not being played :wink:
Warrior came
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
Warrior came
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by turf »

FROM A TO B wrote:
turf wrote:
ancientnloyal wrote:Are there any reasons for ainscough's absence?

leaving out our top scorer, super leagues top scorer (in less games than most of his rivals) needs to have a good excuse
That is what I am trying to figure out ancientnloyal, but at the moment, I am rather :conf: and :angry: and :eusa17: about why Noble has dropped poor Ainscough.

I feel massively sorry for the young lad Ainscough, because he has done nothing to warrant what Noble has done to him.

I flamin well hope he takes Ainscough to Edinburgh (spelling) against Saints!!!! :angry: :angry: :angry:
why feel sorry for him, he's a young lad with a very bright future in the game.

wouldn't be suprised if it is a financial reason for him not being played :wink:
First point, he has done nothing wrong to my knowledge to warrant being dropped by our dipstick of a coach.

Why would it be a financial reason for him not being played. I am extremely :conf: about that comment, because he's hardly taking up space on the salary cap is he?
neilbass
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:54 am

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by neilbass »

Only just caught up with all the news. Sad to say I am not surprised.

Hard to know what to say on here to be honest.

Hated all the rumour stuff last week - no foundation in truth.

All I can say is last minute let-downs can never help a player with ambition.

Feel torn - any way people can contact me off board for why I feel this way?
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Team v Wakey

Post by turf »

neilbass wrote:Only just caught up with all the news. Sad to say I am not surprised.

Hard to know what to say on here to be honest.

Hated all the rumour stuff last week - no foundation in truth.

All I can say is last minute let-downs can never help a player with ambition.

Feel torn - any way people can contact me off board for why I feel this way?
Like Ainscough. I said it the other day, it must be gutting for Ainscough for Noble to just drop him, because Ainscough, must be thinking, "what in the blue hell have I done to be dropped".

Not good for his confidence, I say.
Post Reply