Phelps counts as one of the five quota players but his contract was up at the end of the 2009 season and will be up again at the end of 2010 so the quota was not and is not a problem.butt monkey wrote:Unfortunately, there are restrictions on the number of overseas that can play for one team.
If anything we should be asking do we use up precious quota spots on players of Phelps standard? If the new regime is true to its word we will never sign an average Aussie again preferring to promote from within, rightly or wrongly.
Every now and again a player will not fulfil his contractual obligations. It happens but that doesn't have anything to do with the question is Phelps ultimately a good enough full back. Plenty of people are willing to try hard but that alone isn't enough IMO.PLUS the added fact that, despite Phelps already having a quota spot, he has shown a willingness to try and settle and progress playing-wise, rather than the usual "final payday" Aussies. Or would you rather have Wigan constantly sign players like Jason Ryles, who are gone as soon as they arrive? What use they, for team building/squad consistency?
Wigan have a lot of contracts up at the end of 2010 including Phelps. He will have to improve on 2009 to get a sniff of a new deal IMO. He is very willing and very enthusiastic but this is a ruthless pro sport and if when we have cap money free, a better player is available coinciding with Phelps contract being up he will be gone IMO.Now, if you said Wigan were signing Billy Slater etc, that IS a different matter, however very unlikely - a sad fact that has to be recognised.
When we were at the top the club never kept hold of players just because they were popular if they thought they could get better. I don't see Phelps being immune from this under new regime.
Dave