Re: 13 a side????
Re: 13 a side????
It makes sense get rid of two fat forwards and save a fortune on the salarys that clubs are having too pay out lets face it 2000 at salewont cover robbos contract even ignoring peralini. but rah rah is realising the game is pants at club level with only the internationals having any interest. the rugby league should be building on this with home internationals cancel all league games for a weekend and have double headers england v ireland and scotland v wales stat to develop the international game and take on rah rah we all know it is total pants and noe the hacks are realising it too league needs to be on its guard
13 a side????
...am I imagining things or is this really John Imbecile (sorry Inverdale) who wrote this article?http://www.scrum.com/columns/inverdale/inverdale47.asp