Rock Bottom

MrsLam · Post by **MrsLam** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:07 am

O but I dont like the naughty corner

Vaealiki is not a full back and never will be! Too slow and every single kick seemed to turn him around even when it shouldn't have.

Doveoverdave · Post by **Doveoverdave** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:09 am

mario posted:
MrsLam posted:
Yeah but Mario. We should have known that they would come out and have a go at us. It means a lot to them too, it shows they're taking super league bids seriously, they want to get as far as they can and all that.
Fact is tonight was completely unacceptable. Fair enough if we'd been kept close and actually played but we didn't play. I wasn't expecting us to thrash em but I was NOT expecting that type of match. I hope it changes before next week.
The thing is we did'nt play well,the conditions were bad and UTC are not as bad as most people think.
WNAC
I bet you were gutted that we come back to win!

Look at the other scores tonight! Are UTC 50 points or so better than Pia or York?

I have been rounded on here a couple of times for my views and have occaionally defended wnac.

OK the guy goes off the deep end now and again but his views on the club and the players are in line with my own.

I talk the team up by my awful predictions of the recent results and crowd size - because I truly thought that the team could not be as bad as I thought.

How wrong I was

robjoenz · Post by **robjoenz** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:13 am

Doveoverdave posted:
Look at the other scores tonight! Are UTC 50 points or so better than Pia or York?

Simple answer, YES! They are in SL next season and have been preparing for that. They stuffed Hull KR in the last round, something atleast York would not do as HKR are in the top 3 of NL1. We were awful, but UTC did themselves proud tonight.

GeoffN · Post by **GeoffN** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:15 am

Doveoverdave posted:
Look at the other scores tonight! Are UTC 50 points or so better than Pia or York?

I don't know, and neither do you. The fact is, though, that UTC are in SL next year, the other two are nowhere near.

Doveoverdave · Post by **Doveoverdave** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:20 am

robjoenz posted:
Doveoverdave posted:
Look at the other scores tonight! Are UTC 50 points or so better than Pia or York?
Simple answer, YES! They are in SL next season and have been preparing for that. They stuffed Hull KR in the last round, something atleast York would not do as HKR are in the top 3 of NL1. We were awful, but UTC did themselves proud tonight.

Rob they will be in SL next year WITH A NEW IMPROVED TEAM.

Their team was a depleted as our own and they gave us more than a game.

Hells bells man a team beats Hull KR and you think we (as the Wigan team) should quaking in our boots.

You have the small village mentality of a Leyther or Feathestone fan.

This is Wigan rugby league club we're talking about!!

Doveoverdave · Post by **Doveoverdave** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:22 am

GeoffN posted:
Doveoverdave posted:
Look at the other scores tonight! Are UTC 50 points or so better than Pia or York?
I don't know, and neither do you. The fact is, though, that UTC are in SL next year, the other two are nowhere near.

Looks like we're nowhere near at the mo.

GeoffN · Post by **GeoffN** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:24 am

We were answering your question "are they 50 points better than Pia or York"

Doveoverdave · Post by **Doveoverdave** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:25 am

No IMO

MrsLam · Post by **MrsLam** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:26 am

Why not?

GeoffN · Post by **GeoffN** » Sat May 07, 2005 12:27 am

Doveoverdave posted:
No IMO

As a regular watcher of all 3 teams, I presume?

Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom

Re: Rock Bottom