stains v Salford

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
mike binder
Posts: 9763
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:17 pm

Re: stains loose to Salford :)

Post by mike binder »

i think if that was us in that situation u would of expected us to get the try ,dont think ganson had any option but b of d
mikebinderflooring@yahoo.co.uk for all your carpets and vinyls suppiled and fitted


TROPHIES COMING HOME
IT COMING HOME
ITS COMING HOME
ITS COMING
TROPHIES COMING HOME
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: stains loose to Salford :)

Post by GeoffN »

I hope Wellens' injury is OK, the longer he stays at fullback for them, the better.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: stains v Salford

Post by cpwigan »

Move to General RL ?
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11307
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: stains loose to Salford :)

Post by Kittwazzer »

old hooker wrote:Three of the tries scored by Saints were very dubious to say the least.
Even their own fans are saying the same. God, I love the RedVee site when Stains suffer a shock defeat!!
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: stains v Salford

Post by cpwigan »

If ever a decision showed why officials should not be involved in their home town matches it was the benefit of the doubt farce by Ganson around the 70thish minute. You can imagine him watching the screen screaming at Saints to get themselves sorted and whoa he has to make a decision. One that IMO stretched credibility.
User avatar
ian b
Posts: 845
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:50 pm

Re: stains v Salford

Post by ian b »

cpwigan wrote:If ever a decision showed why officials should not be involved in their home town matches it was the benefit of the doubt farce by Ganson around the 70thish minute. You can imagine him watching the screen screaming at Saints to get themselves sorted and whoa he has to make a decision. One that IMO stretched credibility.
listened to GMR and a few people echo what you are saying because that benefit of the doubt was a joke, the mans a prat
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: stains v Salford

Post by cpwigan »

He is, it was and it did Ian. Some people have said ah but he was OK with his early decision even ruling out an Eastmond try that was perhaps legitimate but it is as time runs out in a match and the scoreline is close that home town officials like Ganson show their true colours.

People like to hide behind benefit of the doubt BUT the reality was/is the doubt was overwhelming in favour of the ball not being grounded. 99.9% would have ruled No Try.

Last minute of a GF or CC Final, Ganson Video Referee, his decision determines whether Saints win or lose. IMO, Ganson will make a decision based on his allegiance towards Saints.
ancientnloyal
Posts: 14389
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: Howe Bridge
Contact:

Re: stains v Salford

Post by ancientnloyal »

https://www.ancientandloyal.com/

James Slevin
Ces Mountford
And the “kind of rugby player you’d want to be in your dreams” James Leytham
Should be in the Wigan Warriors Hall
Of Fame
Post Reply