Rock Bottom

[robjoenz]

heydude posted:

robjoenz posted:


UTCs was there for the full 90.

bloody hell they must have been good lasted 10 minutes longer than anybody else.

Oh aye, they didn't look tired when they were swapping shirts and shorts!

Think it might have been my football upbringing sneaking in there, I apologise!

[GeoffN]

robjoenz posted:
[ In the French league UTC have a points difference of 602, Pia have a difference of 292, this is over 16 games, which makes them statistically over 19 points better than Pia. Given that we were poor tonight and should realistically have won by 20 points this is fair.

Uh-oh! fact alert!
you should know better, Rob!
Only opinions, hearsay, wild guesses, personal insults and pointless repetition are allowed on here now!

We_don't_need_a_fact

[Doveoverdave]

GeoffN posted:

robjoenz posted:
[ In the French league UTC have a points difference of 602, Pia have a difference of 292, this is over 16 games, which makes them statistically over 19 points better than Pia. Given that we were poor tonight and should realistically have won by 20 points this is fair.

Uh-oh! fact alert!
you should know better, Rob!
Only opinions, hearsay, wild guesses, personal insults and pointless repetition are allowed on here now!

We_don't_need_a_fact

Are UTC 50 points superior of the opposition faced by Leeds & Saints tonight?

Fact - no

[GeoffN]

Doveoverdave posted:

Are UTC 50 points superior of the opposition faced by Leeds & Saints tonight?

Fact - no

Correct, except for your punctuation, which should read "Fact? No."

Opinion? Yes.

Learn the difference.

[robjoenz]

Doveoverdave posted:
Are UTC 50 points superior of the opposition faced by Leeds & Saints tonight?

Fact - no

GeoffN and I have spent the last 20 messages or so trying to get you to understand the answer to this question so you go and reword it.

You suffer from the same lack of understanding of English terminology of WNAC, a fact is something that can be proven, an opinion cannot. It is your opinion that UTC are a similar par to York and Pia, despite strong, credible, fact based arguments to the contrary.

[Doveoverdave]

GeoffN posted:

Doveoverdave posted:

Are UTC 50 points superior of the opposition faced by Leeds & Saints tonight?

Fact - no

Correct, except for your punctuation, which should read "Fact? No."

Opinion? Yes.

Learn the difference.

Geoff I'm suprised at what a sore loser you are!

Seem to recall you pulled up WNAC for using poor grammer. Lose another debate?

[MrsLam]

Is it possible to lose an opinion based debate?

[robjoenz]

MrsLam posted:
Is it possible to lose an opinion based debate?

Depends if it goes to a vote I suppose.

I have noticed though DOD, that you have gone off subject and have begun to make petty insults and pointless comments.

[GeoffN]

robjoenz posted:

MrsLam posted:
Is it possible to lose an opinion based debate?

Depends if it goes to a vote I suppose.

I have noticed though DOD, that you have gone off subject and have begun to make petty insults and pointless comments.

See the "don't feed the trolls" notice I posted a while back.
They score a creditable 7/10, at least, on the "trollmeter"

[robjoenz]

GeoffN posted:

robjoenz posted:

MrsLam posted:
Is it possible to lose an opinion based debate?

Depends if it goes to a vote I suppose.

I have noticed though DOD, that you have gone off subject and have begun to make petty insults and pointless comments.

See the "don't feed the trolls" notice I posted a while back.
They score a creditable 7/10, at least, on the "trollmeter"

I've also noticed that very often when I make a point that I think is very valid it often gets ingored by the likes of WNAC and DOD. Don't think they really like a decent debate, just like to cause a little controversy.