Re: JOHN MARTIN?

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
Post Reply
DaveO
Posts: 15910
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: JOHN MARTIN?

Post by DaveO »

Doc Warrior posted:
I see John Martin wants more say in the running of the club does this mean well all be stood on our seats and singing at half times.

Bring Back the Riverside! :eusa18:
Where have you seen this and why should he be given more say in the running of the club? And I don't mean reasons like because Mo os rubbish etc because I thought Mo bought a majority shareholding off Whelan earlier this year.


So basically he has no more call for a bigger say in the running of the club than you or I.

Dave
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7475
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: JOHN MARTIN?

Post by Mike »

At the bottom of this article from the MEN:
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/sport ... an_22.html
it says:
Another bad day for Wigan but former director John Martin revealed he wants further talks about being more involved in running the club despite the rejection of a consortium's offer to owner Dave Whelan.
Whether you believe anything you read in the MEN is up to you....
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
DaveO
Posts: 15910
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: JOHN MARTIN?

Post by DaveO »

Mike posted:
At the bottom of this article from the MEN:
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/sport ... an_22.html
it says:
Another bad day for Wigan but former director John Martin revealed he wants further talks about being more involved in running the club despite the rejection of a consortium's offer to owner Dave Whelan.
Whether you believe anything you read in the MEN is up to you....
In that case it is probably made up! For a start it says a consortiums offer was rejected when the club say no offer was made.

Dave
Post Reply