dallas try

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
User avatar
waterside glens
Posts: 3048
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:32 am

Re: dallas try

Post by waterside glens »

dallas posted:
e-mailed the rfl and had a very polite reply from stuart cummings, he said that both the referee and the touch judge were very confident wirh their decisions :doz: :doz: :exc:
reminds me of that old song come on , come on lets stick together
User avatar
MrsLam
Posts: 3433
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:34 pm
Contact:

Re: dallas try

Post by MrsLam »

dallas posted:
e-mailed the rfl and had a very polite reply from stuart cummings, he said that both the referee and the touch judge were very confident wirh their decisions :doz: :doz: :exc:
Erm, what did you expect?
Even if they had said maybe it was a try, they can't do anything now it wasn't Warringtons fault that the decision had been given so they couldn't dock points and they couldn't give us any because it wasn't a certain draw, we could have missed the kick.
:thum: Ancient and Loyal :thum:

2005 - Play for pride
2006 - Play!
User avatar
robjoenz
Posts: 5458
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 5:25 pm

Re: dallas try

Post by robjoenz »

MrsLam posted:
Erm, what did you expect?
Even if they had said maybe it was a try, they can't do anything now it wasn't Warringtons fault that the decision had been given so they couldn't dock points and they couldn't give us any because it wasn't a certain draw, we could have missed the kick.
It's a case of referees never admitting they are faliable and being too arrogant to admit when they make mistakes. Nothing is going to change the result but it would make things easier to swallow if they came out and said they made a mistake instead of covering up by saying 'the officials were very confident' or as the response someone else got 'I support their decision.' Both are cleverly worded so as not to say the right decision was made.
Post Reply