Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
botica
Posts: 712
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 5:07 pm

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by botica »

Most of the tries Pryce has scored, i could have scored!! They were walk ins. Had for instance he been on Charnley's wing, do you think he would have scored them, i doubt it cos he would have had to run.
"Not only did they beat St Helens in the Grand Final, they did it with style" Mike Stephenson 2nd Oct 2010
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by GeoffN »

ancientnloyal wrote:His games:tries ratio is impressive... name a player with a better ratio?

thats the challenge, with proof since the start of 2010 season.
Josh Charnley is close.

5 from 5 last season, 3 from 3 so far this season.
Susi
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 5:19 pm

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by Susi »

er let me think about that no way jose
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by cpwigan »

I was quite impressed how he came back on the inside for his latest try but I haven't watched the full game yet. Remain to be convinced.
OJ
Posts: 1743
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 8:19 pm

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by OJ »

Give me a nano second to give this my full consideration - right done that - NO
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.











RJ
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 10:52 am

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by RJ »

I'm sorry, I could have sworn somebody mentioned bringing Pryce back? I can't say I'd really noticed he'd gone.
highland convert
Posts: 2526
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:44 pm

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by highland convert »

The man is boring, no flair, he scores tries. A lot of wingers are not boring have flair and don't score tries. I suppose the second is the best option. :conf:
j658
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by j658 »

highland convert wrote:The man is boring, no flair, he scores tries. A lot of wingers are not boring have flair and don't score tries. I suppose the second is the best option. :conf:
Hella confused as to who that is directed at. A current Wigan winger? Don't understand at all. Is it directed at Amos who was outstanding (at full back) before getting injured last year?

For me Pryce is decent from 10 yards out, sound in defence and under the high ball. My problem with him is his lack of impact on kick returns and workrate from our own 20. Both Goulding & Richards are extremely good in these areas, especially Pat who runs it in like a 2nd rower. Charnley & Marsh both impressed me on Sunday with their all round workrate.
BriH
Posts: 2581
Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 11:12 am
Location: Prudhoe

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by BriH »

Handy to have him if we are desparate.
dave t
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:02 am

Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back

Post by dave t »

There are a great many fans who dont want Carl back, and I can understand that after seeing his performances in the first team last year.
However, If you look back to those performances, not one of them was in his preferred role of centre ? He either played on the wing or at stand off ?
I watched him last year at centre playing against leeds reserves and he was facing Kallum Watkins,he absolutely murdered him ! he really looked the part at centre and I cant understand why they wont give him a chance there in the first team?
What is the point of the club keeping him for another season if they wont give him a chance in his rightful position? If it were me I would bring him back this week and put him in place of Marsh against Huddersfield
Post Reply