Well that is one way of looking at it but if you were chairman would you try and impose your will on the coach? Or would you take heed of the quote above from Chelsea, appoint a coach and just stand aside and let him get on with it however he liked without you sticking your nose in?butt monkey wrote:TBH if there is one single element of truth in any of this "imposing" players/staff upon Shaun Wane then IMO he should NOT be Wigan's coach.DaveO wrote:Because the rumour is Harris was imposed on Wane as his assistant when Wane wanted Scunthorpe.platt-warrior wrote:Why all the negativity re Wane and Harris?
He sounds from other poster's comments weak-minded, unable to make his own judgements and easily influenced, Bad traits for a future coach of a team with ego's/character as diverse as can be in a team sport.
Perhaps it could be Wane that is the problem here?
In other words the coach should not have to stand up to the chairman on things like who is his assistant because the chairman should just accept who the coach wants and not even try to meddle.
Now granted a coach may want numerous players to be signed and the chairman has to keep a hand on the budget but that is different than imposing staff and/or players on the coach because the chairman himself has made the decision.