So do IMike588 wrote:England of course. Just wish it was still GBMike588 wrote:Pretty new to the site. Posted ages ago and then thought I'd start again.
Firstly, Gelling is raw. There is no other way to describe him. He has potential and a good athletic build but he's no Izzy Folau and I'm sorry but there is a reason why he didn't make the grade in the NRL/wasn't re-signed.
I don't think anyone could doubt the impact of George or the service that he's provided the club BUT I don't necessarily subscribe to the view that his service (passing) is faultless. GC is a great athlete, always has been and he's a very dependable centre who has been consistently good for Wigan but in terms of skills he's not in the same league as Lyon and Gidley (just two import C's that spring to mind).
Not seen enough of Thornley to comment but I'd much rather him be playing regularly for Wigan because he's a Brit and potentially he could play for GB in the future.
Gelling / Thornley
-
- Posts: 35793
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: Gelling out, Thornley in.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
- waterside glens
- Posts: 3048
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 7:32 am
Re: Gelling out, Thornley in.
i said this to a pal at bulls game . Gelling is a centre to me . His most obvious weakness on the wing is he doesn't know when to cut in off the line behind his centre .cpwigan wrote:Jim;
1). You watch a small % of Wigan games
2). You have very limited understanding of RL
Gelling is a centre / second rower doing his best as a winger. As a winger he is very poor.
-
- Posts: 1940
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:33 pm
Re: Gelling out, Thornley in.
[/quote]waterside glens wrote:quote="cpwigan"]Jim;
Gelling is a centre / second rower doing his best as a winger.
I would say this was made clear to SW before Gelling arrived,by Dean Bell.Due you not think this topic has now run its course?
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 8:02 pm
Gelling no good?
Iv watched just about all the games this season and it is apparent that Gelling is absolutely useless on the wing.
Why is Shaun Wane still playing him there? We have lost god knows how many tries this season because of him.
When I have seen Gelling on the inside from second row, he has progressed with more confidence and made more yardage. On the wing he hasn't got a clue what to do.
Seems reminiscent of Joel Tomkins playing centre last year. Absolutely useless!!!
What do you think?
Why is Shaun Wane still playing him there? We have lost god knows how many tries this season because of him.
When I have seen Gelling on the inside from second row, he has progressed with more confidence and made more yardage. On the wing he hasn't got a clue what to do.
Seems reminiscent of Joel Tomkins playing centre last year. Absolutely useless!!!
What do you think?
Re: Gelling no good?
He is not a great player but today he was not even in the top 3 of worst players on the pitch.
Sam
Charnley though obviously injured
Finch
Sam
Charnley though obviously injured
Finch
-
- Posts: 1468
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Gelling no good?
I'm afraid everything we all feared came to pass. Directly responsible for 2 Leeds tries and no real idea of positional play. All summed up at the end when Hock desperately burst to the wing on the last tackle looking for a break - Gelling was never in a position to take a pass.
Give him a break and get someone to decide on his final position in the team and teach him the basics of wing/centre play.
Give him a break and get someone to decide on his final position in the team and teach him the basics of wing/centre play.
-
- Posts: 11307
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Gelling no good?
Never confident with Gelling on the wing but I'm not singling anyone out today. We just weren't good enough. Early errors gave em too much of a lead and they never looked back. Can't take anything away from Leeds. They wanted it more than we did!
- michael inch stoke
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:07 am
Re: Gelling no good?
Cant say anything different than that, spot onKittwazzer wrote:Never confident with Gelling on the wing but I'm not singling anyone out today. We just weren't good enough. Early errors gave em too much of a lead and they never looked back. Can't take anything away from Leeds. They wanted it more than we did!
Re: Gelling / Thornley
I've never called Gelling cos I believe in giving a guy a chance, but I am rapidly loosing faith. He plays like an amateur, will he get better? I doubt it.
- El Bobbers
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 12:46 pm
Re: Gelling / Thornley
I would give Thornley a chance but not because Gelling was particularly bad today, it's unfair to single him out today as he didn't make so many mistakes. I jst think he hasn't proven to be a good winger. Also, im not sure how Josh can be named as one of the 3 worst players on the pitch thats just ridiculous.
I was thinkning that during the videos refs review of Charnleys try saving tackle he was looking to see if he could give hall out in touch before the ball was touched down so that he would only give a scrum close to wigans line rather than a penalty which would be cleared up the line. I'm not one for conspiracy theories but today made me reconsider.
I was thinkning that during the videos refs review of Charnleys try saving tackle he was looking to see if he could give hall out in touch before the ball was touched down so that he would only give a scrum close to wigans line rather than a penalty which would be cleared up the line. I'm not one for conspiracy theories but today made me reconsider.
Do the trees feel cold when the wind blows?