Re: Who would you rather have: Hock or Wane?

medlocke · Post by **medlocke** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 9:08 am

I seem to recall somebody getting slated by 90% of the board 2 years ago for saying this would happen

Owd Codger · Post by **Owd Codger** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 11:58 am

For goodness sake, give it a rest and let the management of the club do the job that managements do, Manage!

eccywarrior · Post by **eccywarrior** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 1:07 pm

josie andrews wrote:This is a stupid thread

agreed josie.
its obvious that nobody knows whats actually going on asking who would you have hock or waney? for starters there is no beef between hock and waney. its lenaghan and hock

Southern Softy · Post by **Southern Softy** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 3:36 pm

Why doesn't the club release a statement? It could simply say "Gareth Hock is a Wigan player - he will remain so and we look forward to him being part of a successful team when he fully recovers from injury"

That would clear things up.

Wandering Warrior · Post by **Wandering Warrior** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:30 pm

Both brain dead!

phild1 · Post by **phild1** » Sun Jan 20, 2013 7:43 pm

josie andrews wrote:This is a stupid thread

i agree bin it.

Owd Codger · Post by **Owd Codger** » Mon Jan 21, 2013 8:04 am

It's not the only thread that want's binning!

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:52 am

phild1 wrote:
josie andrews wrote:This is a stupid thread
i agree bin it.

Very much so

cpwigan · Post by **cpwigan** » Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:55 am

medlocke wrote:I seem to recall somebody getting slated by 90% of the board 2 years ago for saying this would happen

You were wrong then and you are wrong now

If you have no idea what you are talking about better to keep your mouth closed :exc: