Thomas Burgess
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:42 am
Thomas Burgess
Poor poor poor really needs dropping ,too many mistakes for this level of rugby.
-
- Posts: 11307
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Thomas Burgess
Couldnt agree more. How bad can Luke be if Tom is better?up the junction wrote:Poor poor poor really needs dropping ,too many mistakes for this level of rugby.
Or is Bananaman pitching for a nice little number off Mr Crowe?
Re: Thomas Burgess
He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.
-
- Posts: 11307
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Thomas Burgess
Yes, but the World Cup is hardly the place to develop him!cpwigan wrote:He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.
Re: Thomas Burgess
Totally agree KW, Big Earl was a better selection IMO and Mossop is also a better prop.Kittwazzer wrote:Yes, but the World Cup is hardly the place to develop him!cpwigan wrote:He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.
-
- Posts: 11307
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Thomas Burgess
Correct, and what makes it worse is the fact that his twin brother is so noticeably a better player, they are bound to be compared. McNamara must surely see this. Question is, has he got the nous or the bottle to drop him. He's played in both games now and been found lacking!cpwigan wrote:Totally agree KW, Big Earl was a better selection IMO and Mossop is also a better prop.Kittwazzer wrote:Yes, but the World Cup is hardly the place to develop him!cpwigan wrote:He has potential but he still needs to develop considerably.
Re: Thomas Burgess
The Burgess brothers are there for the publicity, imo only George is good enough for his England spot. People can bring up NRL stats but this isn't the NRL.
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:42 am
Re: Thomas Burgess
Sam's a great player also ,his around game imo is the better of the four by a mile,but I think he should probably be playingKaii wrote: The Burgess brothers are there for the publicity, imo only George is good enough for his England spot. People can bring up NRL stats but this isn't the NRL.
prop or second row leaving 13 free for Lockers .
Re: Thomas Burgess
The Burgess brothers are very good to outstanding players. Sam and George are very destructive players.
I too prefer the idea of Sam having stints at prop / second row for England.
I too prefer the idea of Sam having stints at prop / second row for England.
-
- Posts: 316
- Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:37 pm
Re: Thomas Burgess
made far too many mistakes yesterday,Mossop was dropped for less,keep Graham in Lockers at 13 and Sam B in front/second row spot