No, you can't blame the video referee because he is not there to check if the ref called held or not.robjoenz posted:
Additionally I am informed that you could clearly see Kirkpatrick signal last tackle a few frames before the ball went down for a try from the sideline camera shot, in which case it was the video referee that was to blame.
KK will have asked him to judge if the attacking player grounded the ball on or over the line because he was unsighted. The video ref will only have been looking at that aspect of the play.
So the fault lies entirely with KK who, having called held and raised his hand for the 5th tackle then effectively decides the player was not held.
KK showed a complete lack of confidence in his own decsion making.
The defenders on hearing "held" would not expect to have to prevent the player from grounding the ball.
So having called held and raised his arm for the 5th tackle the dynamics of the situation were changed and he should have stuck by his decision. Penalty to Wigan.
IMO the ref reacted to the Wakefield crowd who cheered for a try after he had caled held. He did the same earlier in the game when he gave them a penalty when they all went bananas over a perfectly OK tackle.
He is, a quite useless referee.
Dave