This is a result of years of letting quality players go and replacing them with inferior players. Signings who people try to make out to be successes are average at best and are inferior to the players they are replacing. The policy that everyone is replaceable, no matter what, is plain stupidity and arrogance. This is shown up even more when the next generation like Burgess are leaving before they have even made it and our signings consist of players from London, Celtic Crusaders, Wakefield etc and has been from the NRL like Bowen and never beens like Gelling and Pettybourne.Top Cat wrote:I know i might get some flak but I think a lot of our players are not good enough.
The club can also hardly expect loyalty from players when it shows little the other way. I said some time ago that youngsters getting peanuts with promises of riches later will haunt us when the said riches never come and the next generation see players like Hansen, Goulding etc leaving (players what are like them 10 years down the line) because they can get way more elsewhere.
Similarly is the way we welcome back players with open arms, such as Mossop and Joel, when their new ventures dont work out just to prove a point that it is okay to let players go because they will come back. More nonsense. We shouldn't let players have that safety net and nearly every player that has left a club has come back a worse player.