hooker

TrueBlueWarrior · Post by **TrueBlueWarrior** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 12:27 am

I would absolutely keep Logan as he is currently playing good enough to make the 17 every week! Is he a GREAT prospect? No! Is he better than MM? Absolutely not!!

Firestarter · Post by **Firestarter** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 7:59 am

Ur not on trial slim and I never said I wanted to replace mm but sometimes you have to reshuffle a team from time to time.mm could play emergency back row with ease.i just want a fast game breaking hooker coming off the bench to give the opposition something different to think about.leuluai would be welcomed back because I always rated him more of a 9 than a 7. Burrow does this at Leeds which also works.sometimes having pace at the ruck sucks the opposition defence more infield and creates gaps out wide

Smokie Jim · Post by **Smokie Jim** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 11:28 am

I concur with. What you say especially re speeding the game up and the effect Burrow brings to a game. Incidentally I really like the look of young Sutcliffe. Leeds have struck gold with this fellow ensuring Sinfield will not be overly missed

Firestarter · Post by **Firestarter** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 11:35 am

Yea he looks quality a young Gareth hock without the attitude me thinks

medlocke · Post by **medlocke** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 1:23 pm

MMs downfall is he doesn't play 80 minutes

butt monkey · Post by **butt monkey** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:26 pm

Everyone's rattling on about who is better

How is MM though? I know he took a hard knock and after a few minutes treatment declined being carried off and even seemed to want to stay on the field. Common sense was observed and he never returned. Was it just concussion or worse?

shaunedwardsfanclub · Post by **shaunedwardsfanclub** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 2:44 pm

cherry toffee wrote:Hampshire and Williams are future 6 and 7. why keep turning everyone into back up hookers when we have M.M and L.T with Waterworth coming through

We need to put an extra yard of pace on Luke Waterworth and he will be an outstanding player for us.

Panchitta Marra · Post by **Panchitta Marra** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:51 pm

Slim Jim wrote:
Obviously not which a competent reader should glean from the my post which prompted your query LT is a great prospect tho'

I wouldn't swap McIllorum for any hooker in Superleague.
His enthusiasm on the field is second to none, he is as hard as nails and as creative as any other hooker on his day.

TrueBlueWarrior · Post by **TrueBlueWarrior** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 6:15 pm

Panchitta Marra wrote:
Slim Jim wrote:
Obviously not which a competent reader should glean from the my post which prompted your query LT is a great prospect tho'
I wouldn't swap McIllorum for any hooker in Superleague.
His enthusiasm on the field is second to none, he is as hard as nails and as creative as any other hooker on his day.

Apparently Bob Beswick is the way forward PM!!

exiled · Post by **exiled** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 8:54 pm

medlocke wrote:MMs downfall is he doesn't play 80 minutes

How the hell is that MM's fault? It is the coach that decides.

hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker

Re: hooker