Who suggested that? I think you will find what was said was that if the club wants to keep a player it has to better other offers on the table and can't rely on other factors that may lead the player to accept a lower offer.Whelley Warrior wrote:Mike, I cannot believe that some supporters can even think that IL should better any offer for what is a fringe squad player.....Mike wrote:I can't see ILs contradiction.
He said thornley had two offers. One frmo Wigan and one from HKR. HKR's was slightly higher and thornley went with the bottom line. IL must have thought there was enough "value add" in our offer to make up for the small cash difference.
I'm not sure why people think we must have wanted him out. If we had we could have pushed him out anytime, given him a free transfer wherever he wanted and wished him well - happens all the time. I think we wanted to keep him out of sentiment (he's a SW favourite IMO) but IL didn't want to break the bank for it.
Nothing to do with him being a fringe player (he wasn't anyway until he got injured, he was a first choice centre) but whether the club wants to retain him or not and having to make the best offer if that is what the club wants.
As to Mike's idea we wanted to keep him out of sentiment how does that work? You make an offer to a player who you don't really want to keep?
What if he accepts? You got someone you didn't really want on the cheap? Rather cynical don't you think?
Certainly no way to plan a team.