Second Row wrote:yet again total bias against Wigan , 6 reviews for us none referred and only the 2 for Warrington and 1 referable.
Its nearly the same in every game and some of the decisions are a disgrace to the game.
The decisions on Kyle Leuluai and Ashton Simms being classic examples of what is wrong with the so called disciplinary committee, who prove time and time again that it all depends on their personal attitude towards certain teams and players.
medlocke wrote:If that had been Hock it would have been double figures
If that had been Hock he'd have been banned for a year!!
Not that i would have been bothered , it's just the principal of it
I knew that meds
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Everything is looked at, just not everything is looked at twice. What I reckon you should do then is look at the number of MRP files on every team from every game and then that's when it's reasonable to suggest they are trying to find some issues with Wigan players, which given they aren't charging them, it would be hard to prove anyway. What we don't know, and never really will, is why makes them get looked at - refs report? If so, who was ref each time and do certain refs refer more to be looked at? Match commissioner report? Same deal. Who is reviewing the games before they go to MRP? Same person for each team each time? I assume not, but we don't know. That's the hidden part of this process though.
But like I said, referrals aren't much to worry about if they don't mean charges.
Why was Mossop not cited? He placed his hand on the pitch in a dangerous position, and could have caused serious injury to the delicate Mr Simms, had he tripped over it. Ashton Simms is to be applauded in pointing out the hazzard with his foot to the referee.
Following a Judicial Review of my computer, I hope I have now resolved my inability to participate
Whelley Warrior wrote:Amazing how they can spot foul offences by Wigan players in comparison to foul offences on Wigan players.
Match Officials, Disciplinary Committee and even Sky commentators!
If the players aren't getting charged then the disciplinary committee have nothing to do with it. Have you ever thought though that maybe it's you that's the biased one? Just an idea for you to consider, given that your role in the sport is to support one side and their roles have a much wider remit.
Whelley Warrior wrote:Amazing how they can spot foul offences by Wigan players in comparison to foul offences on Wigan players.
Match Officials, Disciplinary Committee and even Sky commentators!
If the players aren't getting charged then the disciplinary committee have nothing to do with it. Have you ever thought though that maybe it's you that's the biased one? Just an idea for you to consider, given that your role in the sport is to support one side and their roles have a much wider remit.
Excuse me, but I am not the only one on here who has made similar observations about what goes on each week with the inconsistent citing's and punishments.
that was a deliberate attempt to stamp on Mossop's hand & could have been a lot worse if he had connected properly!
, it's just the principal of it 
that was a deliberate attempt to stamp on Mossop's hand & could have been a lot worse if he had connected properly!