We have been better without out him at certain points in the season I agree with that. He came back in and we suffered a bit. Bateman should be put into that slot asap but have a hunch Bateman will be centre next season and Gelling/Sarge on the wing.DaveO wrote:If we carry on with Lockers you have to ask why. If Wane thinks we can't do without him then that points to the need to recruit surely?medlocke wrote:Time for Lockers to retire, we can't carry him for another season unless he takes a massive wage cut and only plays a portion of the season, would be a shame if he ended up doing a Paul Sculthorpe, that was just embarrassing
If he does play on and only plays effectively part time in some of the games but not others that is just disruptive.
At one point this season we looked to have learned to play without him and then Wane put him in the team again. I think it was around the time of the cup game v HKR and we looked like strangers as a team that day and lost to a side that got beat 50-0 by Leeds in the final!
SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
-
- Posts: 817
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 8:05 am
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
Matty Smith put up a poor showing but I don't blame him for our defeat. When I think about his game/skills I struggle to think of anything he is very good at.
Pass selection - average
Kicking - below average
Tackling - poor
Pace - below average
Taking on the line - poor.
leadership - average at best
He doesn't come up with moments of inspiration as all good 7s do and he's at an age now where you won't get any notable level of improvement from him.
Tries his best, but his best just isn't good enough IMO.
Pass selection - average
Kicking - below average
Tackling - poor
Pace - below average
Taking on the line - poor.
leadership - average at best
He doesn't come up with moments of inspiration as all good 7s do and he's at an age now where you won't get any notable level of improvement from him.
Tries his best, but his best just isn't good enough IMO.
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
YES ,not good enough in the loose. Would Gildart make a better fist of it ?And if not ,why not?
mp
-
- Posts: 4195
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
Are you really suggesting Gildart in at loose forward?menpond wrote:YES ,not good enough in the loose. Would Gildart make a better fist of it ?And if not ,why not?
He is too lightweight for Centre, never mind loose.
You and Bombhead don't half come up with some crazy ideas.
I honestly don't feel Bateman is up for being a ball playing loose yet which we have utilised Lockers as. He is in the mould of an extra 2nd rower playing loose.
If we start to link our 7, 6 and 1 next year well then we can afford for our Loose to play like an additional 2nd rower.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
I'd pick Rocky ahead of him every day.Wigan_forever1985 wrote:I'd pick gale ahead of him any day
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 4195
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
Two different positions...shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:I'd pick Rocky ahead of him every day.Wigan_forever1985 wrote:I'd pick gale ahead of him any day
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
Ok then, I'd pick Williams before him every day and then play Rocky along side him. Will that do for you? By the way, Wigan don't play with a 6 and 7 and that is part of the problem.nathan_rugby wrote:Two different positions...shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:I'd pick Rocky ahead of him every day.Wigan_forever1985 wrote:I'd pick gale ahead of him any day
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
In the GF and against Saints we lost by not being able to convert pressure in the opposition's 20 into points. We have had this problem all season. I read somewhere that we have scored more tries from kicks then any other team and this is a symptom of our inability to work tries by passing the ball. Bar the ball out the back attack we have very few set plays.
Much as is pains me to say this as I like the bloke, the problem is Matty. He rarely takes on the defensive line as he has not got enough pace. The defence know that he will just act as a pivot and so can set themselves to defend against our edges. When Williams is first receiver he puts that seed of doubt in the minds of defenders as they don't know whether he will pass or run the ball making him a more effective attacking force. We need to pair George with a partner who also has the pace and ability to put that split second of doubt into a defenders head. We need to pair up George with Rocky or Sam with the other playing full back. Personally I would go with Rocky in the halves as Sam seems to have developed well as a FB.
Sadly I think we will have Sam at FB and Matty at half back next year unless Rocky impresses in pre-season or can make himself the stand out goal kicker in the squad.
Much as is pains me to say this as I like the bloke, the problem is Matty. He rarely takes on the defensive line as he has not got enough pace. The defence know that he will just act as a pivot and so can set themselves to defend against our edges. When Williams is first receiver he puts that seed of doubt in the minds of defenders as they don't know whether he will pass or run the ball making him a more effective attacking force. We need to pair George with a partner who also has the pace and ability to put that split second of doubt into a defenders head. We need to pair up George with Rocky or Sam with the other playing full back. Personally I would go with Rocky in the halves as Sam seems to have developed well as a FB.
Sadly I think we will have Sam at FB and Matty at half back next year unless Rocky impresses in pre-season or can make himself the stand out goal kicker in the squad.
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
doc wrote:In the GF and against Saints we lost by not being able to convert pressure in the opposition's 20 into points. We have had this problem all season. I read somewhere that we have scored more tries from kicks then any other team and this is a symptom of our inability to work tries by passing the ball. Bar the ball out the back attack we have very few set plays.
Much as is pains me to say this as I like the bloke, the problem is Matty. He rarely takes on the defensive line as he has not got enough pace. The defence know that he will just act as a pivot and so can set themselves to defend against our edges. When Williams is first receiver he puts that seed of doubt in the minds of defenders as they don't know whether he will pass or run the ball making him a more effective attacking force. We need to pair George with a partner who also has the pace and ability to put that split second of doubt into a defenders head. We need to pair up George with Rocky or Sam with the other playing full back. Personally I would go with Rocky in the halves as Sam seems to have developed well as a FB.
Sadly I think we will have Sam at FB and Matty at half back next year unless Rocky impresses in pre-season or can make himself the stand out goal kicker in the squad.
Maybe next year we need to introduce a new coaching role. Like head of attack and draft in an Aussie like Lockyer or Barrett obviously not these particular individuals but a bloke of similiar experience? Matty Smith can pass a ball very well but the book stops there in terms of what he can do very well on a rugby field.
"If there is no blood on the line, it is not rugby league"
(Russell Crowe)
(Russell Crowe)
-
- Posts: 4195
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: SUPRISED NO ONE MENTIONED SMITH
I know we play the split a lot but I would say George is more often than not 2nd receiver than Smith is.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:Ok then, I'd pick Williams before him every day and then play Rocky along side him. Will that do for you? By the way, Wigan don't play with a 6 and 7 and that is part of the problem.nathan_rugby wrote:Two different positions...shaunedwardsfanclub wrote: I'd pick Rocky ahead of him every day.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."