:slee:
Leeds are not the best team to ever play SL.
There are several better teams than the 2015 Leeds team in SL history.
To suggest Leeds are the best team in the last 40 years is wrong.
Tad worried that those sentences may be too long :eusa18:
Phil Clarke
-
EDINBURGH-WARRIOR
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 1:23 pm
Re: Phil Clarke
Many thanks for that , much appreciated .Ms Andrews comments in a previous post confirmed .cpwigan wrote: :slee:
Leeds are not the best team to ever play SL.
There are several better teams than the 2015 Leeds team in SL history.
To suggest Leeds are the best team in the last 40 years is wrong.
Tad worried that those sentences may be too long :eusa18:
As always regards , EW
2002 and EW is hooked
-
josie andrews
- Posts: 36242
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: Phil Clarke
Stop it!!cpwigan wrote: :slee:
Leeds are not the best team to ever play SL.
There are several better teams than the 2015 Leeds team in SL history.
To suggest Leeds are the best team in the last 40 years is wrong.
Tad worried that those sentences may be too long :eusa18:
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
-
Panchitta Marra
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Phil Clarke
Bradford Bulls all conquering side were much better.cpwigan wrote: :slee:
Leeds are not the best team to ever play SL.
There are several better teams than the 2015 Leeds team in SL history.
To suggest Leeds are the best team in the last 40 years is wrong.
Tad worried that those sentences may be too long :eusa18:
Re: Phil Clarke
Very much, as were Saints in their pomp and Wigan under Madge.