u 18s final

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
mike binder
Posts: 9763
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2005 6:17 pm

u 18s final

Post by mike binder »

does any 1 know were they are playing the final at yet????????
mikebinderflooring@yahoo.co.uk for all your carpets and vinyls suppiled and fitted


TROPHIES COMING HOME
IT COMING HOME
ITS COMING HOME
ITS COMING
TROPHIES COMING HOME
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by cpwigan »

Almost as funny as the club / RFL losing home advantage for the lads.

Brawls happen Schalk at junior, academy, senior incl international level. Very often you get involved because you have to. You need to wake up and realise this is the real world. Hell, the most successful RL matches ever (State of Origin) were sold on violence :wink:

The U18's have a very big squad. They can cover the gaps and still win EVEN away from home
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by cpwigan »

Yep and they have had enough games by my reckoning.

Still is winning important at these levels or is there something far more important? :wink:

If they take care of Ratu or whatever he's called they'll be fine.
My boyZ
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by My boyZ »


Who are the 5 players which are suspended?
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by cpwigan »

Without knowing

TCoyle, McClorrum, Kavanagh, Stanton
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by cpwigan »

Schalk Brits... posted:
And?
If winning isn't important then why such a cry over where it's played?
Just playing Devils Advocate Schalk with a slightly serious point but hey I'm as shy person reluctant to offer my opinions :cool:

Home advantage may have just been more memorable for the young players. May be their only chance to play at the JJB. Then again it may have helped them to win. I never inferred what I was thinking :sly:
My boyZ
Posts: 25
Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 1:07 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by My boyZ »

D,HATTON
R.BRADLEY
N.STANTON
B.KAVANAGH
M.MCLLORUM, There the names posted on RLfans, just looked!
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by cpwigan »

They have enough players to covers those

BUT goota say :D T.Coyle was his dad on the disciplinary panel. I mean come on, he was the first Wigan player in, the rest were simply backing him up and Thomas is a firey chap at best. Now Schalk the judiciary outcome is funny

BTW - The ref was a muppet
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by cpwigan »

I've no idea, I would guess they'll use the same number as they require to qualify for a medal under a normal league structure. The squad has been rotating though in the latter weeks. Sam Tomkins got more game time, Mossop seemed to be playing in order to ensure he'd played enough.
GeoffN
Posts: 12559
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2004 1:40 pm

Re: u 18s final

Post by GeoffN »

My boyZ posted:
D,HATTON
R.BRADLEY
N.STANTON
B.KAVANAGH
M.MCLLORUM, There the names posted on RLfans, just looked!
Now confirmed on the club site...
http://www.wiganwarriors.com/news_full.asp?newsid=1574
Kavanagh 3 games, Bradley 1, the others 2 games.
Post Reply