Wandering Warrior wrote:ian.birchall wrote:But for me last season proved that one hooker, whoever it is, can play 80 minutes which frees up an interchange spot, come back Nicky Kiss or even Bill Sayer.
Generally top clubs have interchange at hooker.
Ok you claim so back that up!
Name all the teams who regularly use one of their bench spots for a dedicated hooking replacement?
I remember reading a book with comments from Ricky Stuart, during an ashes series the then coach was seriously considering dropping Gary Schofield from the team. The Aussies WANTED him to play, knew his weaknesses. So they made big media noises about " how good Schoefield was" and "the Aussies would never consider dropping him". He played and the result was what the Aussies wanted
Does everyone understand the allegory here? Just because two ex players with links at rival clubs claim MM should play, do you not wonder why they would say that? More to the point what their currents clubs must think of them wanting to face such a "legend" on the behest of Morley and co
Don't get me wrong. I want MM to play, but not walk into the side as though last year never happened and we as a team need to start considering his 20 minute by the clock stint every match again
I'm a better fan than you
Because I don't "Boo"!!!
Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are