Don't think Sts are going to do us any favours here. Wakey well in control so far.
Also Lomax at right centre? Good player Lomax but a centre he isn't.
Wakefield v The Smellys
-
captinjack
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:42 pm
Re: Wakefield v The Smellys
Glad Stains got Barbados. The man's totally useless.
Re: Wakefield v The Smellys
Liam Finn for Wakefield, if he was a yard faster he'd be a great player. As it is, his game control and general rugby brain is great.
Re: Wakefield v The Smellys
Should have kept Lomax at fullback.captinjack wrote:Glad Stains got Barbados. The man's totally useless.
Barba hasn't played for yonks and his rustiness is showing.
-
Kittwazzer
- Posts: 11307
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm
Re: Wakefield v The Smellys
Haha.Kittwazzer wrote:Loving the comments on RedVee
"Barba is Matty Bowen without the pace"!
Re: Wakefield v The Smellys
Bottlers Wakefield.
-
shaunedwardsfanclub
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Wakefield v The Smellys
I don't think this is a good result for us, I would have liked Saints out of the equation.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Re: Wakefield v The Smellys
we win tomorrow, we're 3rd. We lose, we're 6th.
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.