These names prove my point, they are all Australian they have a larger talent pool than us so they have players who are not only athletic and physical but have ball handling skills as well players like cronk, slater etc are not only super athletes but immensely skillful as well, the chance of unearthing such a player is thousands to one, yet in australia they have tens of thousands of young players so these players crop up regularly and they bring their skills to the NRL.
Meanwhile in this country we struggle to find such athletes as our talent pool is so small. We struggle to fill a quality superleague a reserve grade is out of the question. Some of our athletes have extremely limited ball skills yet they get a regular gig in our superleague.
What this means is NRL high skill high entertainment. Superleague low skill low entertainment.
Its not all bad news there are skillful British players out there, if you watch youth rugby, the NCL or lower league rugby you will see lots of good skillful players but these players cannot live with the physical monsters at the top level, to develop our game we need to find a way to get our skillful players to survive at the top level, otherwise we will always be playing catch up to the aussies.
Are We Really That Bad?
-
- Posts: 5480
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm
Re: Are We Really That Bad?
But surely the young skilful Aussie backs have their own 'physical monsters' to deal with? Seems to me the main factors are the bigger talent pool there, and the fact that being a top-line rugby league pro is a much more enticing prospect in Australia than here.
-
- Posts: 16036
- Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm
Re: Are We Really That Bad?
And arguably the most successful SL scrum half of the modern era is the not long retired pint sized Rob Burrow. Andy Gregory would be fine.moto748 wrote:Ben Barba isn't big, and he copes all right, as do plenty of others.catman wrote: To play modern rugby league you must be big and fit. You can be the most skillful or intelligent player but if you don't have the physicality or athleticism then you can't play at the top players from the past such as Andy Greg who were brilliant in their own era would not be able to cope with the physical demands of the modern game.
-
- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:53 pm
Re: Are We Really That Bad?
Slater was a jockey before RL so I think that indicates he was small.pedro wrote:slater aint smallold hooker wrote:Cooper Cronk, Billy Slater, James Maloney etc, etc, etc.moto748 wrote: Ben Barba isn't big, and he copes all right, as do plenty of others.
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Are We Really That Bad?
Just short of 5'9" and 13st 12lb.old hooker wrote:Slater was a jockey before RL so I think that indicates he was small.pedro wrote:slater aint smallold hooker wrote: Cooper Cronk, Billy Slater, James Maloney etc, etc, etc.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
- Wigan_forever1985
- Posts: 6676
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm
Re: Are We Really That Bad?
Tommy L hits harder than anyone in SLshaunedwardsfanclub wrote:Just short of 5'9" and 13st 12lb.old hooker wrote:Slater was a jockey before RL so I think that indicates he was small.pedro wrote: slater aint small
Rob burrow is one of leeds most successful players
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
-
- Posts: 1624
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Are We Really That Bad?
You are Eddie Hemmings and I claim my £5.
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:37 pm
Re: Are We Really That Bad?
how long ago?old hooker wrote:Slater was a jockey before RL so I think that indicates he was small.pedro wrote:slater aint smallold hooker wrote: Cooper Cronk, Billy Slater, James Maloney etc, etc, etc.