Who Will It Be?

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
Caboosegg
Posts: 3873
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:51 pm

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by Caboosegg »

I kind off wanted saints to win as if we get through a derby final would have been tasty.

Hopefully wire won't win the GF as it would be such a shame to lose the its always your year chant.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Wiganer Ted
Posts: 3212
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:31 pm

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by Wiganer Ted »

Close game at 13-18 but Wire scored three tries to one.
Great defensive effort that to keep Saints to one try.
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

Tough and uncompromising but short of class. Wire deserved the win but tried their best to throw it away.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
User avatar
yokozuna
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 10:15 am

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by yokozuna »

Firestarter wrote:Saints rarely been onside all game and are defo getting the 50/50 calls
...and the 30/70 ones!
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

Richardson is a turnstile, Lomax is a far better player.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
josie andrews
Posts: 35788
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by josie andrews »

fozzieskem wrote:Not one to blow my own trumpet but I did say wire would win
I also said it yesterday & today!
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
User avatar
Wigan_forever1985
Posts: 6568
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 9:50 pm

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by Wigan_forever1985 »

shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:Richardson is a turnstile, Lomax is a far better player.
he had a shocker!

i did want wire to beat saints but at the same time we now run the risk of them winning the GF and considering how they milked the CC wins i dont know if wolves (or eddie hemmings) would be bearable for the next 10 years if they win
Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure
Caboosegg
Posts: 3873
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:51 pm

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by Caboosegg »

Wigan_forever19​85​ wrote:
shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:Richardson is a turnstile, Lomax is a far better player.
he had a shocker!

i did want wire to beat saints but at the same time we now run the risk of them winning the GF and considering how they milked the CC wins i dont know if wolves (or eddie hemmings) would be bearable for the next 10 years if they win
When has richardson ever played well when saints are in the back foot? Id say hes a bit like brough brillant when everythings going his way Naff when under preasure.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Who Will It Be?

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

Caboosegg wrote:
Wigan_forever19​85​ wrote:
shaunedwardsfan​club​ wrote:Richardson is a turnstile, Lomax is a far better player.
he had a shocker!

i did want wire to beat saints but at the same time we now run the risk of them winning the GF and considering how they milked the CC wins i dont know if wolves (or eddie hemmings) would be bearable for the next 10 years if they win
When has richardson ever played well when saints are in the back foot? Id say hes a bit like brough brillant when everythings going his way Naff when under preasure.
According to a few on here he is the second coming! Many Saints fans don't rate him.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Post Reply