Jake Shorrocks
Re: Jake Shorrocks
Should get at least 4, preferably 8.
Hope Shorrocks is OK as he has had terrible luck with injuries over the last couple of years.
Real problems at scrumhalf/hooker for Monday with Sammut injured and Powell banned.
Also issues with wing with 3 out of 4 injured.
Hope Shorrocks is OK as he has had terrible luck with injuries over the last couple of years.
Real problems at scrumhalf/hooker for Monday with Sammut injured and Powell banned.
Also issues with wing with 3 out of 4 injured.
-
- Posts: 35808
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: Jake Shorrocks
Marshy will be back on Monday & I’d definitely have Escare inmthe squad
Today would have been ideal for him with it being a fast pitch.
Today would have been ideal for him with it being a fast pitch.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:14 pm
Re: Jake Shorrocks
Give Escare a go at scrum half let him take on the line. Question is will Tommy be fit and even if he is he cant manage 80 minutes. Or give Harry Smith a go if he is good enough he is old enough
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Jake Shorrocks
Hope to see Harry Smith given his chance on Monday
According to Cummins there wasn’t any contact with the head which I have to say is probably right,jake seemed to get a dose of whiplash from the tackle..
I don’t know we shall see
According to Cummins there wasn’t any contact with the head which I have to say is probably right,jake seemed to get a dose of whiplash from the tackle..
I don’t know we shall see
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Jake Shorrocks
You call that a tackle?fozzieskem wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:20 pm Hope to see Harry Smith given his chance on Monday
According to Cummins there wasn’t any contact with the head which I have to say is probably right,jake seemed to get a dose of whiplash from the tackle..
I don’t know we shall see
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Jake Shorrocks
I disagree Josie, he would have been playing behind a well beaten pack. Lomax had a field day.josie andrews wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:03 pm Marshy will be back on Monday & I’d definitely have Escare inmthe squad
Today would have been ideal for him with it being a fast pitch.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Jake Shorrocks
I didn’t,Stuart Cummings did and he knows these things more than Ishaunedwardsfanclub wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:03 pmYou call that a tackle?fozzieskem wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:20 pm Hope to see Harry Smith given his chance on Monday
According to Cummins there wasn’t any contact with the head which I have to say is probably right,jake seemed to get a dose of whiplash from the tackle..
I don’t know we shall see
Just don’t expect anything more ban wise from it to be honest but we shall see.
It was unnecessary really the game was over and it was petulance that lead to young Jake being in hospital
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Jake Shorrocks
Completely agree with youshaunedwardsfanclub wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 9:06 pmI disagree Josie, he would have been playing behind a well beaten pack. Lomax had a field day.josie andrews wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 8:03 pm Marshy will be back on Monday & I’d definitely have Escare inmthe squad
Today would have been ideal for him with it being a fast pitch.
Re: Jake Shorrocks
No bloody wonder everyone's gone off to Facebook, unbelievable.
- EagleEyePie
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 9:42 pm
Re: Jake Shorrocks
Peyroux should get a ban, although I can't see it being a particularly long one. There didn't seem to be any contact to the head, but it's not shoulder charges with contact to the head that have been banned, it's all shoulder charges. The reason is because they carry an unacceptable risk of injury. Just like canonball tackles, high tackles or any other type of tackle that carries a ban. So making a shoulder charge probably won't result in a ban on review, but since injuries are a aggravating factor then Peyroux should receive a ban.
We've just seen exactly why shoulder charges are banned and why they were right to do so.
We've just seen exactly why shoulder charges are banned and why they were right to do so.